GERO-318 - all IPR-A evidence equivalents are considered 'approvedTherapy'

[dustinbleile]

https://www.bcgsc.ca/jira/browse/GERO-318

[mathieulemieux]

Should we get the approved evidence level directly by the matching IPR level (with get_evidencelevel_mapping()) instead of

pori_ipr_python/ipr/ipr.py

Lines 26 to 37 in dbafe0a

	def get_approved_evidence_levels(graphkb_conn: GraphKBConnection) -> List[Record]:
	filters = []
	for source, names in APPROVED_EVIDENCE_LEVELS.items():
	filters.append(
	{
	'AND': [
	{'source': {'target': 'Source', 'filters': {'name': source}}},
	{'name': names, 'operator': 'IN'},
	]
	}
	)
	return graphkb_conn.query({'target': 'EvidenceLevel', 'filters': {'OR': filters}})

and then

pori_ipr_python/ipr/constants.py

Lines 5 to 16 in dbafe0a

	APPROVED_EVIDENCE_LEVELS = {
	# sourceIds of levels by source name
	'oncokb': ['1', 'r1'],
	'profyle': ['t1'],
	'cancer genome interpreter': [
	'cpic guidelines',
	'european leukemianet guidelines',
	'fda guidelines',
	'nccn guidelines',
	'nccn/cap guidelines',
	],
	}

?

[dustinbleile]

Yeah, I think I asked pretty much the same thing just now on GERO-318

[dustinbleile]

Updated with these suggested changes based on clinical.