Make fastq header stripping optional

[bede]

No description provided.

[mbhall88]

Big upvote for this.

I am currently doing some internal benchmarking of some decontamination processes, but I can't use Hostile as I have no way of assessing the kept reads as I don't know what reads from the original fastq are kept. Assumeably there must be a way of doing this as you assess the accuracy of Hostile in your preprint?

[bede]

Hey Michael, thanks for nudging – I'll make this optional after I've finished lunch and update this issue

…

On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 05:23, Michael Hall ***@***.***> wrote: Big upvote for this. I am currently doing some internal benchmarking of some decontamination processes, but I can't use Hostile as I have no way of assessing the kept reads as I don't know what reads from the original fastq are kept. Assumeably there must be a way of doing this as you assess the accuracy of Hostile in your preprint? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHWAAG543CHHUZ2TZLKBADXPYREPANCNFSM6AAAAAAZL45BMU> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[bede]

cc @mbhall88

[mbhall88]

Awesome. Thanks @bede. I'll give it a whirl today.

[mbhall88]

Works well 👍

[bede]

Great! Thanks and do reach out on here or email if there's anything else. I'll probably make another release next week