Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 21, 2018. It is now read-only.

An entirely unofficial look at the technology stacks of the 2016 Presidential Campaigns

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

benbalter/2016-campaign-tech

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

22 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

2016 Campaign Tech

An entirely unofficial look at the technology stacks of the 2016 Presidential Campaigns

Results

You can see the full results in the candidates.csv file, but here's the overview:

Check Overall Republicans Democrats
www? 15/15 (100.0%) 10/10 (100.0%) 5/5 (100.0%)
non_www? 14/15 (93.33%) 9/10 (90.0%) 5/5 (100.0%)
https? 14/15 (93.33%) 10/10 (100.0%) 4/5 (80.0%)
enforces_https? 10/15 (66.67%) 8/10 (80.0%) 2/5 (40.0%)
downgrades_https? 0/15 (0.0%) 0/10 (0.0%) 0/5 (0.0%)
canonically_www? 7/15 (46.67%) 5/10 (50.0%) 2/5 (40.0%)
canonically_https? 13/15 (86.67%) 10/10 (100.0%) 3/5 (60.0%)
hsts? 3/15 (20.0%) 1/10 (10.0%) 2/5 (40.0%)
hsts_preload? 1/15 (6.67%) 0/10 (0.0%) 1/5 (20.0%)
sitemap? 8/15 (53.33%) 5/10 (50.0%) 3/5 (60.0%)
robots_txt? 11/15 (73.33%) 7/10 (70.0%) 4/5 (80.0%)
humans_txt? 1/15 (6.67%) 0/10 (0.0%) 1/5 (20.0%)
proper_404s? 13/15 (86.67%) 9/10 (90.0%) 4/5 (80.0%)
dnssec? 4/15 (26.67%) 2/10 (20.0%) 2/5 (40.0%)
ipv6? 8/15 (53.33%) 6/10 (60.0%) 2/5 (40.0%)
google_apps? 2/15 (13.33%) 1/10 (10.0%) 1/5 (20.0%)
open_source? 6/15 (40.0%) 5/10 (50.0%) 1/5 (20.0%)

How the data is gathered

Site Inspector.

Is it accurate?

Your guess is as good as mine. Use at your own peril.

About

An entirely unofficial look at the technology stacks of the 2016 Presidential Campaigns

Resources

Code of conduct

Security policy

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Sponsor this project

Packages

No packages published