This project takes inspiration from gitless and legit, and is influenced by this blog post and this fantastic diatribe. However, I feel all of these tools are either underdeveloped or too opinionated. I want a tool that gives me all the same control as git but without the headache of its impossible to remember commands.
- Stay as close to the original jargon of git as possible, rather than create a dialect or "new" abstractions.
- Some exceptions must be made for the horribly confusing unintuitive names.
- Have a consistant, predictable command names
- Have more useful and predictable default behaviors
- Make recovering from mistakes easier
There are a lot of really terribly named commands here: add, reset, checkout. (checkout? What is this, SVN?) They are probably named so because they are seen from the point-of-view of the stage, rather than the working directory. But since the stage is a new concept to beginners, thinking from the working directory point-of-view is how most new users (or even most normal developers) think.
So here is where I make perhaps the biggest naming changes. Updating the stage copy of a file is now stage
as a verb. Reseting the stage copy is now called unstage
. g reset
now resets the file in the working directory, rather than the file in the stage.
g | git equivalent |
---|---|
g add untracked_file | git add untracked_file |
g rm tracked_file | git rm -r tracked_file Then prompt y/n to delete untracked files in deleted directories. |
g stage | git add -u :/ |
g stage tracked_file | git add tracked_file |
g unstage | git reset HEAD |
g unstage staged_file | git reset HEAD staged_file |
g reset | git checkout -f HEAD |
g reset file | git checkout file |
Here I mostly just enhanced the porcelain commands. At some point, I would like to consolidate the syntax for creating and deleting things, where things can be branches, tags, remotes, etc.
g | git equivalent |
---|---|
g commit | Prompts for commit message inline, rather than opening a text editor |
g commit message | git commit -m message |
g uncommit | git reset --soft HEAD~1 |
g ammend | git commit --amend --no-edit |
g branch branch | stashes working tree, creates or switches branch, and checks out branch |
g rmbranch branch | git branch -d branch TODO: rename? |
g tag tag | git tag tag |
g untag tag | Deletes local tag and shows Y/N prompt to delete remote tag. |
g branches | Print all local and remote branches sorted by last commit date, and more. |
For g branches
it's easiest just to show an example:
user@host:~/project g branches
2 days ago c1632be master -> origin/master
* 11 days ago 1e8eab0 develop -> origin/develop (merged)
5 months ago d58b929 feature/historical -> ? (merged)
5 months ago 3b22622 save -> ?
2 days ago c1632be origin/HEAD
2 days ago c1632be origin/master
11 days ago 1e8eab0 origin/develop
11 days ago 1e8eab0 origin/will
4 weeks ago f58098a origin/paul
By default, all diff commands compare the working directory to something else. By default, that something else is HEAD, not the stage as it is in git, because I think the most common query is "what have I changed since my last commit?" not "what is different between the stage and my working directory?". STAGE refers to the git staging area. I choose to always use the keyword stage rather than index, because they're the same thing and having two names for the same thing is unnecessarily confusing. And calling it the cache in the --cached option just makes it even worse. I avoid the stage/index/cached confusion by choosing to give it a name (STAGE) and treating it like a special reference akin to HEAD.
g | git equivalent |
---|---|
g status | git status |
g review | git diff --cached |
g diff | compare working tree with HEAD (git diff HEAD) |
g diff STAGE | compare working tree with stage (git diff) |
g diff ref | compare working tree with ref (git diff ref) |
g diff STAGE ref | compare stage with ref (git diff --cached ref) |
g diff refA refB | compare refA with refB (git diff refA refB) |
Here, I want practicality and "it just works (TM)". The clone command installs submodules by default. I am (slowly) adding support for popular hosting services. Right now its just Github but I will probably add Bitbucket.
The biggest grievance when working with remotes is the "git pull" command. Which as anyone will tell you, just does "git fetch" followed by "git merge". But merging can be downright dangerous, especially if you have unsaved changed, leading to unsuccessful "git pull" attempts. I am going to avoid "pull" altogether, but to speed things up, my "fetch" operation goes ahead and fast-forwards branches.
g | git equivalent |
---|---|
g clone PATH | git clone --recurse-submodules [-b branch] PATH
|
g fetch | Fetches all remotes and fast-forwards local branches when possible |
g fetch branches | Fetches and fast-forwards the specified branches |
g push | pushes to upstream.
|
g push! | git push --force-with-lease |
g remote | Interactive prompt to add a remote. |
g ff | git pull --ff-only |
g fff | deletes the local branch and rechecks it out (useful when remote branch has been force-pushed and can't be fast-forwarded) |
* To save your Github username where get
can see it: git config --global github.user your_user_name
g | git equivalent |
---|---|
g log | git log --graph --pretty=format:'%h - %d %s (%cr) <%an>' --abbrev-commit -10 |
g ignore file | Adds file to the current .gitignore file |
g submodule | Finds all git repos underneath the main repo and makes them submodules |
g squash n | Squash the last n commits into one commit.
|
g hist | List branches you've recently visited and when (I was about to call it g recent but I mistyped and did g reset ... hence the new name.) |
Because sometimes you just want to type one letter.
Short Aliases | Full |
---|---|
g ? | g status |
g + | g add |
g - | g rm |
g = | g stage |
g ! | g commit |
g @ | g branch |
g # | g tag |
g ^ | g push |
g ^^ | g push! |
I started this project because git log --no-pager
gives an error. Apparently I wanted git --no-pager log
. This was the last straw.
So I decided to "fix" the git CLI.
Here is an even better example of the inanity of git CLI. To get the SHA reference of HEAD, which of these would you use?
git show-ref HEAD --abbrev --hash
or
git rev-parse --short HEAD
Questions:
- Why are they different results?
- Why does
show-ref
use--abbrev
butrev-parse
use--short
? - Why are the options after
HEAD
inshow-ref
but beforeHEAD
inrev-parse
?
I leave answering these questions as an exercise to the reader.
Another example of git's terrible option parsing. This command lists all the local branches that have been merged:
$ git branch --list --merged
* develop
feature/latest
So what do you think this command does?
$ git branch --merged --list
fatal: malformed object name --list
OH MY GOD COULD YOU BE ANY MORE FRAGILE GIT?
Now that I've added tab completion, I think "stage" and "status" are too similar.I've solved that for now by adding short aliases 'g =' and 'g ?'. Not intuitive, but I didn't want to rename status or stage. (Remember, I'm trying to keep as much lingo unchanged.) It's the same number of keystrokes as if using tab completion and one letter. I know, I know, still feels inconvenient somehow.- Also, I have
threefour commands that start with "r" which is a problem for tab completion. Seriously considering renaming 'rmbranch' to 'unbranch' to match 'untag' and 'unstage'.
- I renamed "update" to "fetch" to avoid completion conflicts with "unstage". Also, it really is just fetch + fast-forward. One of my goals is NOT to use different terminology than git, because that makes StackOverflow less useful.