Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deblur workflow output #176

Closed
bishnuadhikari opened this issue Jul 11, 2018 · 14 comments
Closed

Deblur workflow output #176

bishnuadhikari opened this issue Jul 11, 2018 · 14 comments

Comments

@bishnuadhikari
Copy link

I was running deblur workflow using seqs.fna, output from split_libraries_fastq.py as demonstrated in the example, however, I was getting different outputs than those mentioned in the example. I am getting deblur_working_dir, deblur.log and split as outputs instead of getting reference-hit.seqs.fa, reference-non-hit.biom, reference-non-hit.biom, reference-non-hit.seqs.fa, all.biom, and all.seqs.fa as mentioned in the example. I used the deblur workflow previously once but was getting the exact outputs. I am wondering whether, the workflow has changed or something wrong, and I didn't see any changes in the github example usage. I didn't have any ideas how to use the information in current directories for futher downstream analysis if the output is correct. I would really appreciate your suggestions and feebacks on this issue.

Thank you

Best Regards
Bishnu Adhikari

@amnona
Copy link
Contributor

amnona commented Jul 11, 2018 via email

@bishnuadhikari
Copy link
Author

bishnuadhikari commented Jul 11, 2018 via email

@bishnuadhikari
Copy link
Author

Dear Amnon,

Please find the deblur log ran a/c to your suggestions which also got the same error message as above when I gave following command.
(deblurenv) bxa015@js-16-234:~$ deblur workflow --seqs-fp seqs.fna --output-dir output -t 400 --log-level 1

deblur.log
Thank you
Regards
Bishnu Adhikari

@amnona
Copy link
Contributor

amnona commented Jul 14, 2018 via email

@bishnuadhikari
Copy link
Author

bishnuadhikari commented Jul 16, 2018 via email

@bishnuadhikari
Copy link
Author

bishnuadhikari commented Jul 19, 2018 via email

@amnona
Copy link
Contributor

amnona commented Jul 19, 2018 via email

@bishnuadhikari
Copy link
Author

bishnuadhikari commented Jul 19, 2018 via email

@amnona
Copy link
Contributor

amnona commented Jul 22, 2018 via email

@bishnuadhikari
Copy link
Author

bishnuadhikari commented Jul 22, 2018 via email

@amnona
Copy link
Contributor

amnona commented Jul 23, 2018 via email

@bishnuadhikari
Copy link
Author

bishnuadhikari commented Jul 23, 2018 via email

@amnona
Copy link
Contributor

amnona commented Jul 24, 2018 via email

@wasade
Copy link
Member

wasade commented Sep 13, 2018

Closing as the seed issue of casting 1E9 has been addressed.

@wasade wasade closed this as completed Sep 13, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants