Skip to content

Conversation

sdaftuar
Copy link

@sdaftuar sdaftuar commented Nov 5, 2024

Initial corpus for ephemeral_package_eval, introduced in bitcoin/bitcoin#30239.

This should wait until after that PR is merged (marking as draft for now).

@sdaftuar sdaftuar changed the title Initial seeds for ephemeral_package_eval Initial corpora for ephemeral_package_eval Nov 5, 2024
@sdaftuar sdaftuar changed the title Initial corpora for ephemeral_package_eval Initial corpus for ephemeral_package_eval Nov 5, 2024
@glozow
Copy link
Member

glozow commented Nov 13, 2024

Should be ready now

@dergoegge
Copy link
Member

bitcoin/bitcoin#31279 includes changes to the harness and I'm not sure if they change the input format (e.g. bitcoin/bitcoin@2b5d270), if so we might want to re-fuzz after the follow up is merged.

@sdaftuar sdaftuar marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2024 12:58
@maflcko
Copy link
Contributor

maflcko commented Dec 2, 2024

bitcoin/bitcoin#31279 was merged, so if someone has a new set of fuzz inputs, they could be merged now.

@dergoegge
Copy link
Member

so if someone has a new set of fuzz inputs, they could be merged now.

Added mine in #213

@sdaftuar sdaftuar closed this Dec 2, 2024
@murchandamus
Copy link
Contributor

I pulled the fuzz inputs from @sdaftuar’s branch and kicked of some fuzzing of the ephemeral_package_eval target I’ll upstream my inputs later this week.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants