Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose compact blocks high-bandwidth mode state through getpeerinfo #19676

Closed
sipa opened this issue Aug 6, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #19776
Closed

Expose compact blocks high-bandwidth mode state through getpeerinfo #19676

sipa opened this issue Aug 6, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #19776

Comments

@sipa
Copy link
Member

sipa commented Aug 6, 2020

For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers.

Suggestion by @gmaxwell.

@sipa sipa added the Feature label Aug 6, 2020
@fanquake fanquake added the P2P label Aug 6, 2020
@theStack
Copy link
Contributor

Wouldn't this be a tristate rather than a boolean value (Legacy/HB/LB relay), to also see if compact blocks are used at all for a peer?

sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2020
…etpeerinfo

343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 15, 2022
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2023
…etpeerinfo

343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2023
…etpeerinfo

343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2024
…etpeerinfo

343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2024
…etpeerinfo

343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2024
…etpeerinfo

343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2024
…etpeerinfo

343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2024
…etpeerinfo

343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this issue Mar 9, 2024
…etpeerinfo

343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this issue Mar 9, 2024
…etpeerinfo

343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2024
…etpeerinfo

343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2024
…etpeerinfo

343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2024
…etpeerinfo

343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
knst pushed a commit to knst/dash that referenced this issue Mar 25, 2024
…getpeerinfo

broken compact p2p
343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
knst pushed a commit to knst/dash that referenced this issue Mar 30, 2024
…getpeerinfo

broken compact p2p
343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
knst pushed a commit to knst/dash that referenced this issue Apr 4, 2024
…getpeerinfo

broken compact p2p
343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
knst pushed a commit to knst/dash that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2024
…getpeerinfo

broken compact p2p
343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
knst pushed a commit to knst/dash that referenced this issue Apr 8, 2024
…getpeerinfo

broken compact p2p
343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
knst pushed a commit to knst/dash that referenced this issue May 16, 2024
…getpeerinfo

broken compact p2p
343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
knst pushed a commit to knst/dash that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
…getpeerinfo

broken compact p2p
343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
knst pushed a commit to knst/dash that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2024
…getpeerinfo

broken compact p2p
343dc47 test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fa net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png).  The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
  * on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
  * after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)

  Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    reACK 343dc47
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 343dc47 per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`

Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants
@theStack @sipa @fanquake and others