Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BIP324 integration #28331

Merged
merged 10 commits into from Oct 3, 2023
Merged

BIP324 integration #28331

merged 10 commits into from Oct 3, 2023

Conversation

sipa
Copy link
Member

@sipa sipa commented Aug 24, 2023

Part of #27634.

This makes BIP324 support feature complete, through a (default off) -v2transport option for enabling V2 connections. If it is enabled:

  • The NODE_P2P_V2 service flag (1 << 11) is advertized.
  • Inbound connections can use V1 or V2 (automatically detected based on the protocol used by the peer)
  • V2 connections are used on outbound when the NODE_P2P_V2 service is available (or the new use_v2 parameter is set on the addnode RPC).
  • V2 outbound connections that instantly fail get retried as V1.

There are two new RPC fields, "transport_protocol_type" and "session_id", in getpeerinfo.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Aug 24, 2023

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type Reviewers
ACK theStack, mzumsande, Sjors
Approach ACK jonatack
Stale ACK ajtowns, vasild

If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

Conflicts

Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

  • #bitcoin-core/gui/754 (Add BIP324-specific labels to peer details by hebasto)
  • #28464 (net: improve max-connection limits code by mzumsande)
  • #28463 (p2p: Increase inbound capacity for block-relay only connections by mzumsande)
  • #28155 (net: improves addnode / m_added_nodes logic by sr-gi)
  • #27600 (net: Add new permission forceinbound to evict a random unprotected connection if all slots are otherwise full by pinheadmz)
  • #27581 (net: Continuous ASMap health check by fjahr)
  • #27114 (p2p: Allow whitelisting outgoing connections by brunoerg)
  • #27052 (test: rpc: add last block announcement time to getpeerinfo result by LarryRuane)
  • #26863 (test: merge banning test from p2p_disconnect_ban to rpc_setban by brunoerg)
  • #26728 (wallet: Have the wallet store the key for automatically generated descriptors by achow101)
  • #26114 (net: Make AddrFetch connections to fixed seeds by mzumsande)
  • #25907 (wallet: rpc to add automatically generated descriptors by achow101)
  • #22341 (rpc: add getxpub by Sjors)
  • #20892 (tests: Run both descriptor and legacy tests within a single test invocation by achow101)

If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

@Sjors
Copy link
Member

Sjors commented Aug 25, 2023

Not needed for testing here, but it would still be cool to have a lock icon in the peers tab in the GUI, and reveal the session id if you click on it. cc @hebasto

Tested a manual connection between macOS and Ubuntu, found matching session ids, pfew - no man in the middle attack on my local network :-)

My DNS seed hasn't discovered any peers yet announcing the service flag, that could take a while. sipa/bitcoin-seeder#102

@sipa sipa force-pushed the 202308_bip324_integration branch 2 times, most recently from 06a00c4 to 35f0384 Compare August 28, 2023 01:17
@sipa sipa force-pushed the 202308_bip324_integration branch from 35f0384 to bdb7f73 Compare August 29, 2023 02:58
@sipa
Copy link
Member Author

sipa commented Aug 29, 2023

@Sjors Re #28196 (comment):

I've changed a net debug-level log message to say "trying v2 connection ... lastseen=...hrs\n"

@sipa sipa force-pushed the 202308_bip324_integration branch from 7b255b5 to 75a3291 Compare October 2, 2023 22:26
@sipa
Copy link
Member Author

sipa commented Oct 2, 2023

Addressed nits by @mzumsande and @theStack:

diff --git a/doc/bips.md b/doc/bips.md
index 87b5918c72..952d289daa 100644
--- a/doc/bips.md
+++ b/doc/bips.md
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ BIPs that are implemented by Bitcoin Core:
 * [`BIP 173`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0173.mediawiki): Bech32 addresses for native Segregated Witness outputs are supported as of **v0.16.0** ([PR 11167](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11167)). Bech32 addresses are generated by default as of **v0.20.0** ([PR 16884](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16884)).
 * [`BIP 174`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0174.mediawiki): RPCs to operate on Partially Signed Bitcoin Transactions (PSBT) are present as of **v0.17.0** ([PR 13557](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557)).
 * [`BIP 176`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0176.mediawiki): Bits Denomination [QT only] is supported as of **v0.16.0** ([PR 12035](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12035)).
-* [`BIP 324`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0324.mediawiki): Support for the BIP324 v2 transport protocol and the associated `NODE_P2P_V2` service bit is supported as of **v26.0**, but off by default ([PR 28331](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28331)).
+* [`BIP 324`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0324.mediawiki): The v2 transport protocol specified by BIP324 and the associated `NODE_P2P_V2` service bit are supported as of **v26.0**, but off by default ([PR 28331](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28331)).
 * [`BIP 325`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0325.mediawiki): Signet test network is supported as of **v0.21.0** ([PR 18267](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18267)).
 * [`BIP 339`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0339.mediawiki): Relay of transactions by wtxid is supported as of **v0.21.0** ([PR 18044](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044)).
 * [`BIP 340`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki)
diff --git a/src/net.cpp b/src/net.cpp
index c4c2d55c77..6b2ef5f43d 100644
--- a/src/net.cpp
+++ b/src/net.cpp
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ CNode* CConnman::ConnectNode(CAddress addrConnect, const char *pszDest, bool fCo
         const std::vector<CService> resolved{Lookup(pszDest, default_port, fNameLookup && !HaveNameProxy(), 256)};
         if (!resolved.empty()) {
             const CService& rnd{resolved[GetRand(resolved.size())]};
-            addrConnect = CAddress{MaybeFlipIPv6toCJDNS(rnd), addrConnect.nServices};
+            addrConnect = CAddress{MaybeFlipIPv6toCJDNS(rnd), NODE_NONE};
             if (!addrConnect.IsValid()) {
                 LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Resolver returned invalid address %s for %s\n", addrConnect.ToStringAddrPort(), pszDest);
                 return nullptr;

Copy link
Contributor

@theStack theStack left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

re-ACK 75a3291

@mzumsande
Copy link
Contributor

re-ACK 75a3291

@DrahtBot DrahtBot removed the request for review from mzumsande October 2, 2023 23:59
@Sjors
Copy link
Member

Sjors commented Oct 3, 2023

re-ACK 75a3291

@DrahtBot DrahtBot removed the request for review from Sjors October 3, 2023 09:12
@fanquake fanquake merged commit 6f882e6 into bitcoin:master Oct 3, 2023
16 checks passed
@vasild
Copy link
Contributor

vasild commented Oct 3, 2023

ACK 75a3291

@rsantacroce
Copy link

any clear reason why noise protocol hasn't been considered here ?

@Sjors
Copy link
Member

Sjors commented Oct 4, 2023

@rsantacroce the BIP explains this under "Why not use a general-purpose transport encryption protocol?": https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0324.mediawiki

@rsantacroce
Copy link

rsantacroce commented Oct 4, 2023

Thank you, i missed that one! very good explanation now it's the other way around why we don't use it on stratumv2 .... this is for the other repo. thank you and thank you for the great work.

hebasto added a commit to bitcoin-core/gui that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2023
d9c4e34 qt: Add "Session id" label to peer details (Hennadii Stepanov)
f08adec qt: Add "Transport" label to peer details (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This PR adds BIP324-specific labels to the peer details widget:
  -  a transport version
  - a session id

  See: bitcoin/bitcoin#28331 (comment).

  ![image](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/assets/32963518/0e0b4c92-dde0-4b2e-b285-a2c69ef09efc)

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK d9c4e34
  RandyMcMillan:
    ACK d9c4e34
  theStack:
    Tested re-ACK d9c4e34
  MarnixCroes:
    tACK d9c4e34

Tree-SHA512: 524e634b1eedcae535d5c2a10dd8dea90d33d65d6790614f86ab6387a0ec9ee4bbc7646b8c20a5b3f1bccbb69bc52a46514e2b28cb4588979834d945b1f89b3a
Frank-GER pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2023
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getblockcount(), 5)
# verify there is a v2 connection between node 0 and 1
node_0_info = self.nodes[0].getpeerinfo()
node_1_info = self.nodes[0].getpeerinfo()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sipa, am I missing something or should this line read:

node_1_info = self.nodes[1].getpeerinfo()

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This indeed looks like a bug.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch @kashifs. Do you want to open a PR for the fix? If not (for whatever reason), I'm happy to do it and add the commit with your authorship.

Copy link
Contributor

@kashifs kashifs Nov 10, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've opened a PR here. Please let me know if it's done correctly and if there is more that I should do.

achow101 added a commit to bitcoin-core/gui that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2023
…patible with --v2transport

35fb993 test: enable v2 transport for p2p_timeouts.py (Martin Zumsande)
2c1669c test: enable v2 transport for rpc_net.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
cc961c2 test: enable v2 transport for p2p_node_network_limited.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
3598a1b test: enable --v2transport in combination with --usecli (Martin Zumsande)
68a9001 test: persist -v2transport over restarts and respect -v2transport=0 (Martin Zumsande)

Pull request description:

  This makes the functional test suite compatible with BIP324, so that
  `python3 test_runner.py --v2transport`
  should succeed (currently, 12 tests fail for me on master).
  Includes two commits by TheStack I found in an old discussion bitcoin/bitcoin#28331 (comment)

  Note that even though all tests should pass, the python `p2p.py` module will do v2 connections only after the merge of #24748, so that for now only connections between two full nodes will actually run v2.
  Some of the fixed tests were added with `--v2transport` to the test runner. Though after #24748 we might also want to consider running the entire suite with `--v2transport` in some CI.

ACKs for top commit:
  sipa:
    utACK 35fb993. Thanks for taking care of this.
  achow101:
    ACK 35fb993
  theStack:
    ACK 35fb993
  stratospher:
    ACK 35fb993.

Tree-SHA512: 80dc0bf211fa525ff1d092043aea9f222f14c02e5832a548fb8b83b9ede1fcee03c5e8ade0d05c331bdaa492af9c1cf3d0f0b15b846673c6eacea82dd4cefbc3
@fanquake
Copy link
Member

fanquake commented Dec 7, 2023

Removing label, as this got a release note.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet