New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hold mempool.cs for the duration of ATMP. #12368
Conversation
This resolves an issue where getrawmempool() can race mempool notification signals. Intuitively we use mempool.cs as a "read lock" on the mempool with cs_main being the write lock, so holding the read lock intermittently while doing write operations is somewhat strange. This also avoids the introduction of cs_main in getrawmempool() which reviewers objected to in the previous fix in bitcoin#12273
Thanks, fixes the test failures for me. (At least the wallet and mempool related ones, heh)
|
re-utACK 02fc886 (second commit obviously not for backport) |
I don't think this is correct because of lock order. You correctly say // mempool "read lock" (held through GetMainSignals().TransactionAddedToMempool()) And when it hits But, for instance, Correct me if I'm wrong, but can't this create a deadlock? |
There is no lock order across TransactionAddedToMempool as it is called on a background thread (and can wait as long as it wants). |
Right, utACK 02fc886. |
utACK 02fc886. We probably want to rethink how locking of chainstate/mempool works later on (either by using actual rwlocks, or by allowing the mempool to lag behind chain validation). |
utACK 02fc886 |
02fc886 Add braces to meet code style on line-after-the-one-changed. (Matt Corallo) 85aa839 Hold mempool.cs for the duration of ATMP. (Matt Corallo) Pull request description: This resolves an issue where getrawmempool() can race mempool notification signals. Intuitively we use mempool.cs as a "read lock" on the mempool with cs_main being the write lock, so holding the read lock intermittently while doing write operations is somewhat strange. This also avoids the introduction of cs_main in getrawmempool() which reviewers objected to in the previous fix in #12273 Tree-SHA512: 29464b9ca3890010ae13b7dc1c53487cc2bc9c3cf3d32a14cb09c8aa33848f57959d8991ea096beebcfb72f062e4e1962f104aefe4252c7db87633bbfe4ab317
This resolves an issue where getrawmempool() can race mempool notification signals. Intuitively we use mempool.cs as a "read lock" on the mempool with cs_main being the write lock, so holding the read lock intermittently while doing write operations is somewhat strange. This also avoids the introduction of cs_main in getrawmempool() which reviewers objected to in the previous fix in #12273 Github-Pull: #12368 Rebased-From: 85aa839 Tree-SHA512: 90a505a96cecc065e8575d816f3bb35040df8672efc315f45eb3f2ea086e8ea6ee2c99eed03d0fe2215c8d3ee947a7b120e3c57a25185d03550c9075573ab032
This resolves an issue where getrawmempool() can race mempool notification signals. Intuitively we use mempool.cs as a "read lock" on the mempool with cs_main being the write lock, so holding the read lock intermittently while doing write operations is somewhat strange. This also avoids the introduction of cs_main in getrawmempool() which reviewers objected to in the previous fix in bitcoin#12273 Github-Pull: bitcoin#12368 Rebased-From: 85aa839 Tree-SHA512: 90a505a96cecc065e8575d816f3bb35040df8672efc315f45eb3f2ea086e8ea6ee2c99eed03d0fe2215c8d3ee947a7b120e3c57a25185d03550c9075573ab032
Github-Pull: bitcoin#12368 Rebased-From: 02fc886 Tree-SHA512: 8e159541f5270801fd3c70540ad3c55e93f0ba37039e651d21f65ba9b271bbbb2f1389b13a0f40fea337e88bb1711f498bb3ee1230ec2c40b6530846ff241a8b
02fc886 Add braces to meet code style on line-after-the-one-changed. (Matt Corallo) 85aa839 Hold mempool.cs for the duration of ATMP. (Matt Corallo) Pull request description: This resolves an issue where getrawmempool() can race mempool notification signals. Intuitively we use mempool.cs as a "read lock" on the mempool with cs_main being the write lock, so holding the read lock intermittently while doing write operations is somewhat strange. This also avoids the introduction of cs_main in getrawmempool() which reviewers objected to in the previous fix in bitcoin#12273 Tree-SHA512: 29464b9ca3890010ae13b7dc1c53487cc2bc9c3cf3d32a14cb09c8aa33848f57959d8991ea096beebcfb72f062e4e1962f104aefe4252c7db87633bbfe4ab317
02fc886 Add braces to meet code style on line-after-the-one-changed. (Matt Corallo) 85aa839 Hold mempool.cs for the duration of ATMP. (Matt Corallo) Pull request description: This resolves an issue where getrawmempool() can race mempool notification signals. Intuitively we use mempool.cs as a "read lock" on the mempool with cs_main being the write lock, so holding the read lock intermittently while doing write operations is somewhat strange. This also avoids the introduction of cs_main in getrawmempool() which reviewers objected to in the previous fix in bitcoin#12273 Tree-SHA512: 29464b9ca3890010ae13b7dc1c53487cc2bc9c3cf3d32a14cb09c8aa33848f57959d8991ea096beebcfb72f062e4e1962f104aefe4252c7db87633bbfe4ab317
02fc886 Add braces to meet code style on line-after-the-one-changed. (Matt Corallo) 85aa839 Hold mempool.cs for the duration of ATMP. (Matt Corallo) Pull request description: This resolves an issue where getrawmempool() can race mempool notification signals. Intuitively we use mempool.cs as a "read lock" on the mempool with cs_main being the write lock, so holding the read lock intermittently while doing write operations is somewhat strange. This also avoids the introduction of cs_main in getrawmempool() which reviewers objected to in the previous fix in bitcoin#12273 Tree-SHA512: 29464b9ca3890010ae13b7dc1c53487cc2bc9c3cf3d32a14cb09c8aa33848f57959d8991ea096beebcfb72f062e4e1962f104aefe4252c7db87633bbfe4ab317
This resolves an issue where getrawmempool() can race mempool notification signals. Intuitively we use mempool.cs as a "read lock" on the mempool with cs_main being the write lock, so holding the read lock intermittently while doing write operations is somewhat strange. This also avoids the introduction of cs_main in getrawmempool() which reviewers objected to in the previous fix in #12273 zcash: cherry picked from commit 85aa839 zcash: bitcoin/bitcoin#12368
zcash: cherry picked from commit 02fc886 zcash: bitcoin/bitcoin#12368
Bitcoin 0.16 locking PRs These are locking changes from upstream (bitcoin core) release 0.16 (Aug 14, 2017, to Feb 16, 2018), oldest to newest (when merged to the master branch). Each commit also includes a reference both to the PR and the upstream commit. - bitcoin/bitcoin#11126 - Excludes changes to wallet tests that we don't have. - bitcoin/bitcoin#10916 - first commit only; second commit already merged by d9fcc2b - bitcoin/bitcoin#11107 - Only the last commit. - bitcoin/bitcoin#11593 - bitcoin/bitcoin#11585 - bitcoin/bitcoin#11618 - bitcoin/bitcoin#10286 - Only the third and last commits. - bitcoin/bitcoin#11870 - bitcoin/bitcoin#12330 - bitcoin/bitcoin#12366 - bitcoin/bitcoin#12368 - bitcoin/bitcoin#12333 - Only the first commit.
This resolves an issue where getrawmempool() can race mempool
notification signals. Intuitively we use mempool.cs as a "read
lock" on the mempool with cs_main being the write lock, so holding
the read lock intermittently while doing write operations is
somewhat strange.
This also avoids the introduction of cs_main in getrawmempool()
which reviewers objected to in the previous fix in #12273