New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: Fuzz on macOS #27932
test: Fuzz on macOS #27932
Conversation
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. ReviewsSee the guideline for information on the review process.
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update. |
Looks like this fails https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6065266690359296?logs=ci#L3616
|
Concept ACK Would there be any value in making this a separate task? |
Concept ACK |
Also, fix a few bugs: * Error: RPC command "enumeratesigners" not found in RPC_COMMANDS_SAFE_FOR_FUZZING or RPC_COMMANDS_NOT_SAFE_FOR_FUZZING. Please update test/fuzz/rpc.cpp. * in run_once: ...format(" ".join(result.args), ... TypeError: sequence item 2: expected str instance, PosixPath found
Not unless there is a benefit. |
Concept ACK |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Github ACK fae7c50
Adds fuzzing to a new architecture, right? Seems like an easy win?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK fae7c50
Any reason not to?