Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consensus: Decouple from chainparams.o and timedata.o #8077

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2016

Conversation

jtimon
Copy link
Contributor

@jtimon jtimon commented May 20, 2016

Do it for the consensus-critical functions:

  • CheckBlockHeader
  • CheckBlock
  • ContextualCheckBlockHeader

Part of #7829. Competing with #7985 and #7947.

Rationale: if these functions are to be moved to the consensus module/package, they need to stop depending on chainparams.o and timedata.o from the server package.
Somewhat analogous to #7459.

Do it for the consensus-critical functions:

- CheckBlockHeader
- CheckBlock
- ContextualCheckBlockHeader
@dcousens
Copy link
Contributor

utACK ee9f4a5

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented May 21, 2016

ut/Concept ACK ee9f4a5

@arowser
Copy link
Contributor

arowser commented May 25, 2016

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@afk11
Copy link
Contributor

afk11 commented May 28, 2016

utACK

@sipa sipa merged commit ee9f4a5 into bitcoin:master Jun 1, 2016
sipa added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2016
ee9f4a5 Consensus: Decouple from chainparams.o and timedata.o (Jorge Timón)
@jtimon jtimon mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2016
codablock pushed a commit to codablock/dash that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2017
…ta.o

ee9f4a5 Consensus: Decouple from chainparams.o and timedata.o (Jorge Timón)
andvgal pushed a commit to energicryptocurrency/gen2-energi that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2019
…ta.o

ee9f4a5 Consensus: Decouple from chainparams.o and timedata.o (Jorge Timón)
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants