Newsletters: add #37 (2019-03-12) #118
Conversation
| where it could be verified reasonably quickly. | ||
|
|
||
| O'Connor also raised a [similar concern][roconnor sighash] regarding | ||
| the soft fork's proposal to remove unallocated sighash type bytes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would it be better to say "treat unallocated sighash type bytes as invalid"? (vs. removing bytes)
|
tACK. Other than my minor comment (which is optional to address) this newsletter looks ready to go! Oh, and the fixme image. |
| --- | ||
| title: 'Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #37' | ||
| permalink: /en/newsletters/2019/03/12/ | ||
| name: 2019-03-05-newsletter |
| highly encouraged to [test it][0.18.0] for regressions and other | ||
| problems that could affect your use of it in production. Any testing | ||
| is appreciated, but if you have some extra time after testing for your | ||
| specific use cases, please consider helping test the GUI. This |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
please consider helping test the GUI
Perhaps it would be useful to work in a link to all of the GUI tagged PRs in 0.18.0, to help direct people of what to test?
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+label%3AGUI+milestone%3A0.18.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This was a great idea, thanks!
| the block header---one where it points to a single invalid 64-byte | ||
| transaction and one where it points to two valid transactions. | ||
|
|
||
| FIXME: image |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This was on your todo, just making extra sure by commenting on it.
harding
force-pushed
the
2019-03-12-newsletter
branch
from
17d7e5d to
7893e88
Compare
harding
force-pushed
the
2019-03-12-newsletter
branch
from
7893e88 to
4141ea2
Compare
|
Addressed review comments (thanks!) and added deferred image. |
|
re-tested ACK |
Todo:
(So sorry this is so late!)