Skip to content

Conversation

hulatown
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.


- [Sjors Provoost][provoost ctvcom]:“让我也谈谈我自己的动机。保险库似乎是提案启用的唯一功能,我个人认为重要到值得为之工作。[...] 直到最近,我似乎认为保险库的势头在于 OP_VAULT,而这反过来又需要 OP_CTV。但单一目的的操作码并不理想,所以这个项目似乎没有进展。[...] 相反,我不反对 CTV + CSFS;我没有看到它们有害的论据。由于几乎没有 MeVil 潜力,我也可以想象其他开发者小心地开发和推出这些更改。我只会关注这个过程。我_会_反对的是像共同签署人 Paul Sztorc 提议的基于 Python 的替代实现和激活客户端。”

- *<!--signatory-statements-->**签署者声明:* 信的签署者在后续声明中也澄清了他们的意图:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure about the *s here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You mean the * in the comment? I think it is needed, otherwise the compiling couldn't pass.
And the extra * pair before the title is to keep the original link in case the title is mixed with Chinese and English words.


- [Harsha Goli][goli ctvcom]:“大多数人签署是因为他们真的不知道下一步应该是什么,而交易承诺的压力如此之大,以至于一个糟糕的选择(签署信)比不作为更优。在信件发出前的对话中(由我的行业调查促成),我只收到许多签署者对信的责备。我实际上不知道有任何一个人明确认为这是一个好主意。即便如此,他们还是签了名。这其中暗藏玄机。”

- **<!--op-cat-enables-winternitz-signatures-->****OP_CAT 启用 Winternitz 签名:** 开发者 Conduition 在 Bitcoin-Dev 邮件列表上[发布][conduition winternitz]了一个[原型实现][conduition impl],使用提议的 [OP_CAT][topic op_cat] 操作码和其他脚本指令,允许使用 Winternitz 协议的[量子抗性][topic quantum resistance]签名由共识逻辑验证。Conduition 的实现需要近 8,000 字节的密钥、签名和脚本(大部分受见证折扣影响,减少链上重量到约 2,000 vbytes)。这比 Jeremy Rubin 之前提议的另一个基于 `OP_CAT` 的量子抗性[Lamport 签名][Lamport signature]方案小约 8,000 vbytes。
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure about the *s here

Co-authored-by: Mike Schmidt <schmidty@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@bitschmidty bitschmidty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hulatown youll see there remain some mis-formed * pairings. See screenshot for rendering:
Screenshot 2025-07-28 at 8 17 03 AM

@hulatown
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh, I see. Thanks Mike!
Noted and fixed these.

Copy link
Contributor

@bitschmidty bitschmidty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK, thank you @hulatown

@bitschmidty bitschmidty merged commit 5005860 into bitcoinops:master Jul 30, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants