Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor for a generic BaseSyncWorker #283

Closed
sunkup opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #284
Closed

Refactor for a generic BaseSyncWorker #283

sunkup opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #284
Assignees
Labels
refactoring Quality improvement of existing functions
Milestone

Comments

@sunkup
Copy link
Member

sunkup commented Apr 11, 2024

We probably want to extend PeriodicSyncWorker and SyncWorker from a generic "BaseSyncWorker", as is the case in DAVx5.

  • This will result in less running workers, such that the quota might not be hit as fast - which has been a problem in DAVx5.
  • Kind of mandatory before adding ICSx5 to DAVx5

@ArnyminerZ I have assigned you with this, if that's ok? Otherwise I can do it too :)

@sunkup sunkup added the refactoring Quality improvement of existing functions label Apr 11, 2024
@sunkup sunkup modified the milestones: 2.2.2, 2.2.3 Apr 11, 2024
@ArnyminerZ ArnyminerZ linked a pull request Apr 12, 2024 that will close this issue
@sunkup sunkup modified the milestones: 2.2.3, 2.2.2 Apr 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactoring Quality improvement of existing functions
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants