Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Create Competing Transaction proposals #168

Closed
matiu opened this issue Apr 24, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Create Competing Transaction proposals #168

matiu opened this issue Apr 24, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@matiu
Copy link
Collaborator

matiu commented Apr 24, 2014

From Tx proposal:
(Create a Tx that competes with this one) button
- need to use the same UTXOS:
=> Will have a max amount

In the tx list will be show as:
  (competes with) and signing / reject button will need to be adapted
  to make sense with competing tx logic.
@matiu matiu added the epic label Apr 24, 2014
@matiu matiu changed the title - Create Compiting Transaction proposals Create Competing Transaction proposals Apr 24, 2014
@ryanxcharles ryanxcharles added this to the Not for launch milestone May 19, 2014
@matiu matiu added the lowprio label Nov 18, 2014
@matiu matiu added Idea and removed epic labels Apr 11, 2015
matiu added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2015
@matiu
Merge pull request #168 from cmgustavo/matias/bug/digest-01
6c1c020 
removes apply
@matiu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

matiu commented Nov 28, 2015

After all this time, this does not seem to be needed.

@matiu matiu closed this as completed Nov 28, 2015
@matiu matiu removed the lowprio label Nov 28, 2015
bitjson pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2016
@cmgustavo
Merge pull request #168 from cmgustavo/ref/design-44
510cedd 
Return cached address while BWS returns main address GAP reached
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ryanxcharles @matiu