[PM-24051] OpenApi generated models with pascal-case alias for serde serialization

[mzieniukbw]

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-24051

📔 Objective

Added pascal-case serde serialisation alias for all OpenApi generated models.

Issue: The OpenApi generated models only contain the camel-case name of the field. This does not work during deserialisation of Bitwarden server responses, since most of them are in pascal-case.

Persistent models update will be taken care of by Update API Bindings GH workflow, once merged.

Example model updated:

 #[derive(Clone, Default, Debug, PartialEq, Serialize, Deserialize)]
 pub struct MasterPasswordUnlockResponseModel {
-    #[serde(rename = "kdf")]
+    #[serde(rename = "kdf", alias = "Kdf")]
     pub kdf: Box<models::MasterPasswordUnlockKdfResponseModel>,
-    #[serde(rename = "masterKeyEncryptedUserKey")]
+    #[serde(
+        rename = "masterKeyEncryptedUserKey",
+        alias = "MasterKeyEncryptedUserKey"
+    )]
     pub master_key_encrypted_user_key: Option<String>,
-    #[serde(rename = "salt")]
+    #[serde(rename = "salt", alias = "Salt")]
     pub salt: Option<String>,
 }

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation
  team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed
  issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – ab2cec18-402e-42a5-bf6a-2bb5e87dbb9e

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 77.98%. Comparing base (a0531e8) to head (b93237e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #512   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.98%   77.98%           
=======================================
  Files         287      287           
  Lines       27673    27673           
=======================================
  Hits        21582    21582           
  Misses       6091     6091           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.