fix(deps): update dependency node-jose to v2.2.0 [security] #843
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
2.1.0
->2.2.0
GitHub Vulnerability Alerts
CVE-2023-25653
Description
When using the non-default "fallback" crypto back-end, ECC operations in
node-jose
can trigger a Denial-of-Service (DoS) condition, due to a possible infinite loop in an internal calculation. For some ECC operations, this condition is triggered randomly; for others, it can be triggered by malicious input.Technical summary
The JOSE logic implemented by
node-jose
usually relies on an external cryptographic library for the underlying cryptographic primitives that JOSE operations require. When WebCrypto or the Nodecrypto
module are available, they are used. When neither of these libraries is available,node-jose
includes its own "fallback" implementations of some algorithms based onnode-forge
, in particular implementations of ECDH and ECDSA.A various points, these algorithm implementations need to compute to the X coordinate of an elliptic curve point. This is done by calling the
getX()
method of the object representing the point, which is an alias of the functionpointFpGetX()
inlib/deps/ecc/math.js
.Computing the X coordinate from the form in which the point is stored requires computing the modular inverse of the Z coordinate, using the
modInverse
function from thejsbn
library (e.g.,this.z.modInverse(this.curve.p)
). The output of this function call is multiplied by another value before being reduced with thebarrettReduce()
function.The root cause of this issue is that the
jsbn
modInverse
function sometimes returns negative results. These results are correct in that they are equivalent mod the relevant modulus, but can be problematic for functions that expect modular operations to always return positive results (in the range[0, p)
, wherep
is the modulus).In particular, while the Barrett reduction algorithm in general can handle negative inputs, the implementation in
node-jose
explicitly does not. Therefore, while the negative value that is returned bymodInverse()
is mathematically correct, it leads to an error inbarrettReduce()
causing an infinite loop which may result in a Denial of Service condition.For a given prime modulus, we estimate that roughly one in every
2^20
inputs produce a negativemodInverse()
. This estimate was validated with exhaustive testing on small primes (<30 bits) and randomized testing with regard to the P-256 prime.Impact
This issue is only present in situations where the "fallback" cryptographic implementation is being used, i.e., situations where neither WebCrypto nor the Node
crypto
module is available.The following elliptic curve algorithms are impacted by this issue (all in
lib/deps/ecc/index.js
):exports.generateKeyPair
)ECPrivateKey.prototype.toPublicKey
)ECPrivateKey.prototype.sign
)ECPublicKey.prototype.verify
)ECPrivateKey.prototype.computeSecret
)In the first three cases, the points being evaluated are generated randomly, so an attack could only arise due to a bad value being randomly selected (as noted above, with probability roughly
2^{-20}
). In the latter two cases, the points being evaluated are provided from outside the library, and thus potentially by attackers.Patches
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?
Workarounds
Since this issue is only present in the "fallback" crypto implementation, it can be avoided by ensuring that either WebCrypto or the Node
crypto
module is available in the JS environment wherenode-jose
is being run.References
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
Credits
Release Notes
cisco/node-jose (node-jose)
v2.2.0
Compare Source
v2.1.1
Compare Source
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.