Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add docs target to build script #146

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
May 23, 2024
Merged

Add docs target to build script #146

merged 11 commits into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

blairconrad
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

…rd2.1

* net462 allows creation of ByRef-Like objects, and we hadn't been
  preventing it before, so why change?
@blairconrad blairconrad force-pushed the check-docs-links branch 2 times, most recently from 6cfe081 to 5ba6189 Compare May 20, 2024 11:36
thomaslevesque and others added 3 commits May 20, 2024 21:34
…byreflike-no-resolver-change

Stop trying to create ByRef-like Dummies on TMFs lower than netstandard2.1
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: requests
  dependency-type: indirect
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
…uests-2.32.0

Bump requests from 2.31.0 to 2.32.0
blairconrad and others added 7 commits May 21, 2024 06:27
…reate-isbyreflike-no-resolver-change"

The content was good, but the commit message was not.
I'll reapply the changes with a better message.

This reverts commit 56759c6, reversing
changes made to 24e908c.
net462 allows creation of ByRef-Like objects, and we hadn't been
preventing it before, so why change?

(cherry picked from commit cd36e6f)

Reapplying commit with better commit message than the original, which
was a dirty lie.
Stop trying to create ByRef-like Dummies on TFMs above net462
@blairconrad blairconrad merged commit 6e18673 into master May 23, 2024
4 checks passed
@blairconrad blairconrad deleted the check-docs-links branch May 23, 2024 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants