Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fields are not noexcept-movable if Allocator is noexcept-movable #894

Closed
djarek opened this issue Nov 18, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Fields are not noexcept-movable if Allocator is noexcept-movable #894

djarek opened this issue Nov 18, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@djarek
Copy link
Contributor

djarek commented Nov 18, 2017

basic_fields should conditionally be noexcept movable to enable some container optimizations based on noexcept.
@djarek djarek mentioned this issue Nov 18, 2017
Closed
@vinniefalco
Copy link
Member

is this still relevant given the other pull request?

@djarek
Copy link
Contributor Author

djarek commented Nov 27, 2017

The scope changed a little, because I assumed that allocators didn't have to be noexcept-movable (they have to, according to the Allocator requirements).

djarek added a commit to djarek/beast that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2017
@djarek
Tidy up basic_fields exception specifiers
6998329 
fix boostorg#894

Signed-off-by: Damian Jarek <damian.jarek93@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@vinniefalco @djarek