Linux arm64 support

[mihaiplesa]

Resolves brave/brave-browser#11836

Submitter Checklist:

• Submitted a ticket for my issue if one did not already exist.
• Used Github auto-closing keywords in the commit message.
• Added/updated tests for this change (for new code or code which already has tests).
• Verified that these changes build without errors on
  • Android
  • iOS
  • Linux
  • macOS
  • Windows
• Verified that these changes pass automated tests (unit, browser, security tests) on
  • iOS
  • Linux
  • macOS
  • Windows
• Verified that all lint errors/warnings are resolved (npm run lint, npm run gn_check)
• Ran git rebase master (if needed).
• Ran git rebase -i to squash commits (if needed).
• Tagged reviewers and labelled the pull request as needed.
• Requested a security/privacy review as needed.
• Added appropriate QA labels (QA/Yes or QA/No) to the associated issue
• Added appropriate release note labels (release-notes/include or release-notes/exclude) to the associated issue
• Public documentation has been updated as necessary. For instance:
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Deviations-from-Chromium-(features-we-disable-or-remove)
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Proxy-redirected-URLs
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Fingerprinting-Protections
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Brave%E2%80%99s-Use-of-Referral-Codes
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Custom-Headers
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Web-compatibility-issues-with-tracking-protection
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/QA-Guide

Test Plan:

Reviewer Checklist:

• New files have MPL-2.0 license header.
• Request a security/privacy review as needed.
• Adequate test coverage exists to prevent regressions
• Verify test plan is specified in PR before merging to source

After-merge Checklist:

• The associated issue milestone is set to the smallest version that the
  changes has landed on.
• All relevant documentation has been updated.

[someoneonboard1]

Will this merge help to run brave on raspberry pi? When can we expect support for raspberry pi?

[mihaiplesa]

@someoneonboard1 it would but from my testing there's many things broken still.

[pmelendez2]

What is plan to merge this PR? I have a Raspberry Pi 3b+ and would like to use Brave on it, as I just switch over to Brave for my daily use. Is there some build and install instructions I can follow? I am familiar with Linux, Git, CLI, etc. so happy to take Brave for a spin on Pi.

[integraldisk]

As above when are we going to be able to get this merged as I am also very excited to get brave on ARM. Are there some significant blockers here? Please share and best of luck!
-ID

[wknapik]

Too early for me to contribute much here. Lgtm.