Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I269 citation definitions in body #271

Merged

Conversation

alexfargus
Copy link
Contributor

This should address the first issue of #269 - displaying the definition in the body of the document. Creating References section is not covered here.

Changing the styling using as_footnote allows the user to specify whether the target of the citation reference is displayed as a footnote or in the section where it is declared.

The existing behaviour has been kept with as_footnote set to True by default.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 26, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #271 (63cfb8f) into master (a291669) will increase coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 94.87%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #271      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.76%   73.80%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          90       90              
  Lines       14288    14318      +30     
  Branches     1969     1972       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        10539    10567      +28     
- Misses       3376     3377       +1     
- Partials      373      374       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10.0-alpha 73.73% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
3.6 73.24% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
3.7 73.24% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
3.8 73.70% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
3.9 73.72% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
Linux 73.73% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
Windows 73.59% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
macOS 73.61% <94.87%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
pypy-3.6 73.27% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
pypy-3.7 73.27% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
regression-3.10 72.08% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
regression-3.6 71.55% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
regression-3.7 71.55% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
regression-3.8 72.05% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
regression-3.9 72.06% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
regression-pypy3 71.58% <94.87%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
unit-3.10 47.08% <61.53%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
unit-3.6 45.96% <61.53%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
unit-3.7 45.96% <61.53%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
unit-3.8 47.10% <61.53%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
unit-3.9 47.10% <61.53%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
unit-pypy3 45.99% <61.53%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/rinoh/reference.py 90.74% <92.59%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
src/rinoh/frontend/rst/nodes.py 85.48% <100.00%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
src/rinoh/stylesheets/matcher.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a291669...63cfb8f. Read the comment docs.

@brechtm brechtm merged commit bc5aefa into brechtm:master Jul 6, 2021
@brechtm
Copy link
Owner

brechtm commented Jul 6, 2021

Thanks for this @alexfargus. Sorry this took so long to review!

I've generalized the code so that as_footnote will also work for plain footnotes. I'll commit those changes soon. I think I'll also replace as_footnote with target (accepts in-place or footnote) so that it's ready to accept additional options (endnote, bibliography?). Suggestions for better labels are welcome :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants