Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tail: die for bad options #547

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mknos
Copy link
Contributor

@mknos mknos commented Apr 11, 2024

  • GetOptions() return value was not checked
  • Symbolic exit codes were already declared so use them more consistently -- this usage() takes an exit code parameter

* GetOptions() return value was not checked
* Symbolic exit codes were already declared so use them more consistently -- this usage() takes an exit code parameter
@github-actions github-actions bot added Type: enhancement improve a feature that already exists Priority: low get to this whenever Program: tail The tail program labels Apr 11, 2024
Copy link
Owner

@briandfoy briandfoy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, this is a type of thing we typically don't check even though we should. Good spot.

@briandfoy briandfoy self-assigned this Apr 11, 2024
@briandfoy briandfoy merged commit 77d72e8 into briandfoy:master Apr 11, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@briandfoy
Copy link
Owner

changes: exit with error if the command line options are wrong

@briandfoy briandfoy added Status: accepted The fix is accepted and removed Priority: low get to this whenever labels Apr 11, 2024
@briandfoy briandfoy added Status: released there is a new release with this fix and removed Status: accepted The fix is accepted labels Apr 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Program: tail The tail program Status: released there is a new release with this fix Type: enhancement improve a feature that already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants