Edits for neutral point of view in truthy/falsy

[jduckles]

Per #29 updating truthy/falsy definitions to be neutral in their point of view.

Author:

• Jonah Duckles

Language:

• English

Terms defined:

None

Editor

Assign the PR based on the language to the following person:

Language	Person
English	@zkamvar
Spanish	@ian-flores
French	@fmichonneau

[zkamvar]

I know I cannot speak for everyone, but I was unaware of what "Boolean" meant until I was in grad school. What do you think about simplifying the definitions (truthy: "evaluates to true" or "colloquially thought to be true") and/or define boolean as well.

[jduckles]

@zkamvar Updated to add a Boolean definition and associated references.

[zkamvar]

Suggested change

	Evaluating to false in a Boolean context.
	Evaluating to false in a [Boolean](#boolean) context.

[zkamvar]

Thank you! I have one more suggestion for cross-linking, purposes, but that should be it! (you can safely ignore the lint error, that should be fixed in another PR).

[jduckles]

@zkamvar I've added a few more deffinitions to build-out the thread of boolean logic. Still more to add in the future though, bytes, kilobytes, megabytes... etc.

[zkamvar]

LGTM. I made some edits to include internal links and streamline the language between definitions. IMO, it may have been overkill to define "true" and "false", but the more the merrier 👍

[zkamvar]

How fun! I approve the merge, yet I'm not a maintainer 😅 @gvwilson, @fmichonneau @ian-flores, do any of you have access to merge this?

[gvwilson]

I think @zkamvar should be a maintainer - @fmichonneau ?

[fmichonneau]

thank you all!
there were a few issues with the formatting of the yaml file that I fixed.
@zkamvar (as well as @gvwilson and @ian-flores) are now "admin" on all 3 glosario-related repos.