Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix build with gcc 5.4 #2836

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2024
Merged

Fix build with gcc 5.4 #2836

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

cmorve-te
Copy link
Contributor

The Core Guidelines state "A base class destructor should be either public and virtual, or protected and non-virtual" so, hopefully, no static analyser will complain.

The Core Guidelines state "A base class destructor should be either
public and virtual, or protected and non-virtual" so, hopefully, no
static analyser will complain.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.16%. Comparing base (8ac8190) to head (4a0f980).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #2836      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.16%   91.16%   -0.00%     
==========================================
  Files         197      197              
  Lines        8381     8379       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         7640     7638       -2     
  Misses        741      741              

@horenmar
Copy link
Member

Sure, let's try this.

@horenmar horenmar merged commit 459ac85 into catchorg:devel Mar 12, 2024
73 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants