-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Be able to initialize with a flattened dict? #170
Comments
Here is the algorithm I used to unflatten a dict https://stackoverflow.com/a/55545369/7391331 |
If this is added, I think it would be good to also have a method to pack in into a flattened dict. |
Adding this feature in Box 7! Please test and give feedback if possible Specifically will require combo of default_box and box_dots, or which is same as using new |
* Adding #169 default functions with the box_instance and key parameter (thanks to Коптев Роман Викторович) * Adding #170 Be able to initialize with a flattened dict - by using DDBox (thanks to Ash A.) * Adding #192 box_dots treats all keys with periods in them as separate keys (thanks to Rexbard) * Adding #211 support for properties and setters in subclasses (thanks to Serge Lu and David Aronchick) * Adding #226 namespace to track changes to the box (thanks to Jacob Hayes) * Adding #236 iPython detection to prevent adding attribute lookup words (thanks to Nishikant Parmar) * Adding #238 allow ``|`` and ``+`` for frozen boxes (thanks to Peter B) * Adding new DDBox class (Default Dots Box) that is a subclass of SBox * Fixing #235 how ``|`` and ``+`` updates were performed for right operations (thanks to aviveh21) * Fixing #234 typos (thanks to Martin Schorfmann) * Fixing no implicit optionals with type hinting
Added in 7.0.0 |
I'm in a situation where I need to deal with some deeply nested structures, but I want to initialize them with dictionaries of dotted keys. So I'd ideally like to be able to do something like:
Now, I can do this if I initialize the Box, then write to it as d.service.name = 'django', but it'd be nice to be able to unflatten the incoming dict somehow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: