Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue #172: readme can be misleading #173

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2017

Conversation

cornelius-k
Copy link
Contributor

expect function was being used in readme examples without ever explicitly defining expect

expect function was being used in readme examples without ever
explicitly defining expect
Copy link
Contributor

@meeber meeber left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@keithamus keithamus merged commit 80b4efb into chaijs:master Oct 19, 2017
@keithamus
Copy link
Member

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants