Skip to content

Conversation

Sh0g0-1758
Copy link
Contributor

@mayantaylor
Copy link
Collaborator

mayantaylor commented Apr 23, 2025

Additionally, can we do the following things:

  • add an example in examples/charm++
  • make sure the charm++ build also builds this library correctly (this might be happening already, but might require some cmake tweaks? not sure). This is also related to my comment about build. Do we want this to build by default?
  • maybe have @ericjbohm look at the usage of ncpy functions

@ericjbohm ericjbohm self-requested a review April 25, 2025 16:50
Copy link
Contributor

@ericjbohm ericjbohm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems functional, but UNREG is unlikely to perform well in latency sensitive contexts.

@Sh0g0-1758 Sh0g0-1758 requested review from ritvikrao and stwhite91 May 1, 2025 13:21
Copy link
Collaborator

@stwhite91 stwhite91 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you change all .hh files to .h and .cc to .C for consistency with the rest of Charm++? Otherwise it looks good to me!

@Sh0g0-1758 Sh0g0-1758 requested a review from stwhite91 May 1, 2025 16:39
@Sh0g0-1758 Sh0g0-1758 requested a review from stwhite91 May 1, 2025 17:38
@Sh0g0-1758 Sh0g0-1758 requested a review from stwhite91 May 2, 2025 17:47
Copy link
Collaborator

@stwhite91 stwhite91 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@Sh0g0-1758 Sh0g0-1758 merged commit 9b0830a into charmplusplus:main May 2, 2025
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants