This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2024. It is now read-only.
BUG Return correct prediction dims with and without lambda #53
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Instead of trying for a one-liner with magic `squeeze` behavior, only squeeze if predicting for a single lambda value, and then only squeeze off the last axis (the lambda path). This way we'll get the correct return shape for all input shapes, including single rows.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead of trying for a one-liner with magic
squeezebehavior, only squeeze if predicting for a single lambda value, and then only squeeze off the last axis (the lambda path). This way we'll get the correct return shape for all input shapes, including single rows.PR #51 fixed 1-row predictions for the case of single-lambda predictions with
LogitNet, but didn't properly handle multi-lambda predictions, and didn't fix 1-row predictions forElasticNet.Closes #52 , #30 , #25 .