Skip to content

Conversation

milldr
Copy link
Contributor

@milldr milldr commented Sep 4, 2025

what

  • Add security_group_id output to expose the security group ID from the underlying RDS cluster module

why

  • This enables proper configuration of inbound and outbound traffic rules for ECS services

references

.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a new Terraform output that exposes the security group ID of the Aurora Postgres cluster. This makes it easier to reference the cluster’s security group in downstream configurations (e.g., networking rules or integrations). No changes to existing outputs or behavior.

- Add security_group_id output to expose the security group ID from the underlying RDS cluster module
- This enables proper configuration of inbound and outbound traffic rules for ECS services
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds a Terraform output named security_group_id in src/outputs.tf, exposing module.aurora_postgres_cluster.security_group_id with a description. Placed after existing outputs; no other files or logic modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Terraform outputs
src/outputs.tf
Added output security_group_id mapping to module.aurora_postgres_cluster.security_group_id with description "The security group ID of the Aurora Postgres cluster".

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

A hop, a bop, a tiny tweak—
I nudge an output, quick and sleek.
Security group, now clear to see,
Aurora’s gate, in plain ID.
Thump-thump! my paws approve this run—
Small change shipped, and swiftly done. 🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/expose-security-group-id

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mergify mergify bot requested review from a team September 4, 2025 16:42
@mergify mergify bot added the triage Needs triage label Sep 4, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/outputs.tf (1)

73-73: Consistency nit: end description with a period.

Matches nearby allowed_security_groups description style.

Apply this minimal change:

-  description = "The security group ID of the Aurora Postgres cluster"
+  description = "The security group ID of the Aurora Postgres cluster."
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b9435d and 61a32e5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/outputs.tf (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/outputs.tf (1)

71-74: Confirm remote module exports security_group_id: The module cloudposse/rds-cluster/aws v2.1.1 (referenced in src/cluster-regional.tf) must expose an output named security_group_id, or the plan will fail. Also verify this output is populated both when you supply an existing SG and when the module creates one.

@milldr
Copy link
Contributor Author

milldr commented Sep 4, 2025

/terratest

@milldr milldr added minor New features that do not break anything and removed triage Needs triage labels Sep 4, 2025
@RoseSecurity RoseSecurity added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 4, 2025
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team September 4, 2025 18:44
Merged via the queue into main with commit 6923504 Sep 4, 2025
49 of 55 checks passed
@RoseSecurity RoseSecurity deleted the feature/expose-security-group-id branch September 4, 2025 19:31
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2025

These changes were released in v1.539.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

minor New features that do not break anything

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants