Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: use security-group module instead of resource #68

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Jun 15, 2021
Merged

Conversation

SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor

what

  • use security-group module instead of resource
  • update tests

why

  • more flexible than current implementation
  • bring configuration of security group/rules to one standard

references

  • CPCO-409

@SweetOps SweetOps requested review from a team as code owners May 25, 2021 16:40
@SweetOps SweetOps requested review from Gowiem and 3h4x May 25, 2021 16:40
@SweetOps SweetOps marked this pull request as draft May 25, 2021 16:40
@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test bats

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test bats

1 similar comment
@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test bats

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test bats

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@SweetOps
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@SweetOps SweetOps marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2021 11:38
outputs.tf Show resolved Hide resolved
@nitrocode nitrocode merged commit 6f4211d into master Jun 15, 2021
@nitrocode nitrocode deleted the CPCO-409 branch June 15, 2021 18:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants