Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate some modules in SimCalorimetry to esConsumes #34995

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 28, 2021

Conversation

makortel
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Part of #31061. The EcalSelectiveReadoutSuppressor (used by EcalSelectiveReadoutProducer) required some reorganization in order to be constructed in the constructor of EcalSelectiveReadoutProducer so that the edm::ConsumesCollector can be passed to it.

PR validation:

Code compiles.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34995/24850

  • This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • SimCalorimetry/EcalSelectiveReadoutAlgos (simulation)
  • SimCalorimetry/EcalSelectiveReadoutProducers (simulation)
  • SimCalorimetry/EcalZeroSuppressionProducers (simulation)

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rchatter, @simonepigazzini, @rovere, @thomreis, @argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b67ecb/18004/summary.html
COMMIT: 3c65031
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-24-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/34995/18004/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2686 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3000352
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 4219
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2996111
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 38 workflows

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Aug 26, 2021

@makortel , do you have an explanation for differences?

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't. Interestingly all the differences are in the DD4Hep workflow 11634.911. Let's try again.

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild, please test

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could this be another symptom of #34448 such that this PR causes something in the Run 3 + DD4Hep configuration the geometry and magnetic field ESProducers to run in opposite order?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b67ecb/18069/summary.html
COMMIT: 3c65031
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-25-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/34995/18069/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3000352
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3000330
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

No differences this time, so the problem appears to have some randomness.

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b67ecb/18085/summary.html
COMMIT: 3c65031
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-26-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/34995/18085/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3000352
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3000330
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Aug 27, 2021

+1

There are two possibility: in the new IB problem gone (fixes #34983 and #34987) or random problem is rare.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants