Phase2-hgx359C Make several updates to the configuration files in Validation/HGCalValidation/test/python in view of updates of Phase2 scenarios

[bsunanda]

PR description:

Make several updates to the configuration files in Validation/HGCalValidation/test/python given updates of Phase2 scenarios

PR validation:

Tested the modified configuration files

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Nothing special

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45445/40895

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Validation/HGCalValidation (dqm)

@antoniovagnerini, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@apsallid, @cseez, @hatakeyamak, @lecriste, @lgray, @missirol, @pfs, @rovere, @sethzenz, @vandreev11, @youyingli this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[cmsbuild]

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a4d557/40368/summary.html
COMMIT: 67bb0df
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-07-12-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/45445/40368/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found 1 errors in the following unit tests:

---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 22 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3345094
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 854
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3344220
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a4d557/40370/summary.html
COMMIT: 67bb0df
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-07-13-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/45445/40370/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

• DAS Queries: The DAS query tests failed, see the summary page for details.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially added 2 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 1665 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3345094
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 506
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3344568
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 46 workflows

[bsunanda]

@antoniovagnerini, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid Please approve this PR

[tjavaid]

@bsunanda , do you expect a plenty of differences e.g. in WF 29634.911 with these updates ?

[bsunanda]

These updates will not cause any difference in any workflows

[tjavaid]

+1

• The differences in WF 29634.911 are spurious (see Segmentation violation in RelVal wf 25234.911 step 2 #42470 and Segfault in HGCalCassette::getShift() in workflow 25234.911 #41927)

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[rappoccio]

+1