add design proposal template

[xmulligan]

fixing #35

[carolynvs]

Sorry I messed up the first PR (#35). I have flagged this for review from the governance WG and our TOC liaisons. @jberkus or @geekygirldawn Can you ping our liaisons for review?

[xmulligan]

@geekygirldawn do you know what the next steps I need to do for this PR are?

[geekygirldawn]

Sorry about this - I think it fell through the cracks in the run up to KubeCon :(

I'm thinking that maybe it shouldn't be named GOVERNANCE-design-proposals.md, but maybe instead called DESIGN-PROPOSALS.md, since it's not really part of the GOVERNANCE.md file. The other files called GOVERNANCE-something.md
are meant to be customized and used as GOVERNANCE.md.

@jberkus did you have any thoughts before this goes to our liaisons for approval?

Also, I know that @jberkus is at a conference this week, so we may need to catch up with him next week for this one.

[xmulligan]

No worries, totally understand that! I've updated the file name and will wait for @jberkus to comment when he is back from the conference

[jberkus]

Added one suggestion; the rest looks good to go.

[xmulligan]

Good point, I've included that now

[jberkus]

Looks good, I'll ping our CNCF liasons.

[TheFoxAtWork]

I've provided a lot of comments, some are pure suggestions, some are proposed rewrites to improve clarity or robustness of the desired content - they're not required as i want to ensure i understand the intent in those areas and leave that to the authors to confirm, clarify, or reject.

[TheFoxAtWork]

adjusted my suggestions based on @dzolotusky 's comments. Dave, please take a second look to see if the suggestions would resolve your comments. @jberkus @xmulligan please also review as this is based on our understanding of the content presented, which may not align with the original intent.

[jberkus]

@xmulligan based on the feedback above, I think this template is going to need an accompanying documentation to be useful. Was that something you'd started on, or do we need to recruit someone else for that?

[TheFoxAtWork]

Just one explanation on the checklist and this will be good to go for me

[xmulligan]

@jberkus @geekygirldawn is there anything else I need to do to get this merged?

[jberkus]

@dzolotusky @TheFoxAtWork is this good enough now?

[TheFoxAtWork]

You've got my approval.

[geekygirldawn]

@dzolotusky - are you with these changes?

[dzolotusky]

@dzolotusky - are you with these changes?

Yes, this looks good to me now.

Sorry for taking so long to get back to you here.

[geekygirldawn]

@amye @TheFoxAtWork - this PR is done, so if one of you could merge it, that would be great!

[TheFoxAtWork]

@geekygirldawn , GitHub is showing you have an outstanding action to review and approve this pull request. I am also not authorized to merge it. Once you review and approve, @amye should be able to merge.

[geekygirldawn]

Thanks for all of your hard work on this!