Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove ProjectSkillController reliance on ja_resources/canary #973

Conversation

landongrindheim
Copy link
Contributor

@landongrindheim landongrindheim commented Sep 26, 2017

Remove ProjectSkillController reliance on ja_resources/canary.

References

Closes #899

Progress on: #864

Copy link
Contributor

@begedin begedin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a minor correction required. Otherwise looks great!

Don't forget to rebase and squash as you make the change.

end

@spec create?(User.t, ProjectSkill.t) :: boolean
def delete?(%User{} = user, %ProjectSkill{} = project_skill) do
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bad spec here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops. I'll update today

@landongrindheim landongrindheim force-pushed the 899-remove-reliance-on-ja-resources branch from 2b2ef2c to 7a9a326 Compare September 26, 2017 11:52
@landongrindheim
Copy link
Contributor Author

@begedin Updated the spec: create? -> delete?

@begedin begedin merged commit 8706859 into code-corps:develop Sep 26, 2017
@begedin
Copy link
Contributor

begedin commented Sep 26, 2017

great work as usual @landongrindheim

@landongrindheim landongrindheim deleted the 899-remove-reliance-on-ja-resources branch October 10, 2017 08:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants