Repository navigation
Replies: 1 comment
|
A clarification on how the app would make money, since it affects the "commercial" question:
The whole app, including any part that uses memory-core, will be fully open source, with its source code public. So the memory logic itself would not be sold or charged for directly, but it would ship inside an app that has paid STT credits. I'd like to know whether that setup is acceptable under the license, or what you would need from me. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi, thanks for building oh-my-openagent. I use it daily and the memory system is a big part of why.
I'm building an assistant app for university students that works with their LMS (courses, assignments, deadlines). I plan to publish the app's source code as open source, and run a hosted version where users buy usage credits to cover model costs.
I would like to reuse the memory logic from this repo, mainly
packages/memory-core(including the recall flow andsrc/recall/assets/kibitzer-persona.md).As I read
LICENSE.md, everything outside third-party components is under the Sustainable Use License 1.0.packages/memory-corehas no separate license file, and itspackage.jsonhas nolicensefield. Under SUL-1.0, distribution is allowed only free of charge for non-commercial purposes, so I don't think a credit-based hosted service could include this code as it is.My questions:
packages/memory-coreis covered by SUL-1.0, not by MIT likesenpi?memory-corein an open-source app that charges for usage credits? If there are terms, I'm happy to hear them.I'll keep all license and copyright notices and mark any modifications, whatever the answer is. Thank you!
All reactions