Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Toyota: parse FW versions for more reliable fuzzy fingerprinting #28641

Merged
merged 90 commits into from Oct 8, 2023

Conversation

sshane
Copy link
Contributor

@sshane sshane commented Jun 22, 2023

v2 of #27029 so its state is preserved

Todos:

  • Figure out a nice way to blacklist
  • Do final verification on data (exclude segment's own FW, test no false positives, etc)

@sshane sshane changed the title Toyota: reliable fuzzy fingerprinting Toyota: fuzzy fingerprinting Sep 8, 2023
@sshane sshane changed the title Toyota: fuzzy fingerprinting Toyota: reliable fuzzy fingerprinting Sep 8, 2023
@sshane
Copy link
Contributor Author

sshane commented Sep 8, 2023

Ported the Hyundai test to figure out which cars this won't work on at the moment, and most of the failures are because we don't have the hybrid ECU logged yet (getting matches for hybrid and ICE variants). Once we add that, our number of platforms that won't work with this new system goes from 20 to 13, out of 51.

Blacklisted platforms for being too similar with their major platform identifier code (two characters):

AssertionError: Items in the first set but not the second:
'TOYOTA C-HR 2018'
'TOYOTA RAV4 HYBRID 2023'
'TOYOTA CAMRY HYBRID 2021'
'TOYOTA RAV4 HYBRID 2022'
'TOYOTA C-HR HYBRID 2018'
'TOYOTA HIGHLANDER 2020'
'LEXUS RX 2020'
'LEXUS ES HYBRID 2019'
'TOYOTA CAMRY 2021'
'LEXUS ES 2019'
'TOYOTA RAV4 2022'
'TOYOTA HIGHLANDER HYBRID 2020'
'TOYOTA RAV4 2023' : (13, 51)

However, we also have minor versions that we can also expand on using in the future (I see a pattern we can use, but I've also seen some overlap, so will take some verification and we can do that after).

@adeebshihadeh
Copy link
Contributor

Common reason for not all dongle routes to fingerprint was a missing ECU (not fuzzy FP's issue).

How common is this? Why does it happen?

@sshane
Copy link
Contributor Author

sshane commented Sep 29, 2023

Not too common. Ran a notebook on rlog data. pandaState error threshold was >10 errors or lost RX/TX messages on bus 0/2 (not 1 since we don't use it for fingerprinting):

The two dongles without any pandaStates errors were a TSS2 RAV4 and Corolla. Corolla didn't have engine because it was responding to another query on startup. RAV4 didn't have EPS because it took over our timeout to respond.

Checked routes: 6121, dongles: 973 platforms: {'TOYOTA RAV4 HYBRID 2019': 668, 'TOYOTA CAMRY HYBRID 2021': 402, 'TOYOTA COROLLA TSS2 2019': 532, 'LEXUS RX 2016': 96, 'TOYOTA HIGHLANDER HYBRID 2020': 312, 'TOYOTA HIGHLANDER 2020': 325, 'TOYOTA PRIUS 2017': 737, 'TOYOTA CAMRY HYBRID 2018': 88, 'TOYOTA RAV4 2019': 464, 'TOYOTA PRIUS TSS2 2021': 285, 'TOYOTA RAV4 HYBRID 2017': 115, 'TOYOTA COROLLA HYBRID TSS2 2019': 222, 'TOYOTA SIENNA 2018': 153, 'TOYOTA AVALON HYBRID 2022': 33, 'TOYOTA RAV4 2017': 172, 'TOYOTA COROLLA 2017': 174, 'TOYOTA HIGHLANDER HYBRID 2018': 89, 'TOYOTA RAV4 HYBRID 2022': 231, 'LEXUS IS 2018': 27, 'TOYOTA HIGHLANDER 2017': 84, 'TOYOTA C-HR HYBRID 2022': 7, 'TOYOTA MIRAI 2021': 34, 'TOYOTA CAMRY 2018': 236, 'LEXUS RX 2020': 64, 'TOYOTA AVALON HYBRID 2019': 19, 'LEXUS ES 2019': 52, 'TOYOTA RAV4 2022': 118, 'LEXUS NX 2020': 25, 'TOYOTA C-HR 2018': 16, 'TOYOTA CAMRY 2021': 92, 'TOYOTA AVALON 2019': 21, 'LEXUS ES HYBRID 2019': 66, 'TOYOTA RAV4 HYBRID 2023': 6, 'TOYOTA C-HR HYBRID 2018': 1, 'LEXUS RX HYBRID 2020': 27, 'TOYOTA AVALON 2016': 15, 'LEXUS RX HYBRID 2017': 51, 'LEXUS NX HYBRID 2018': 27, 'LEXUS NX 2018': 7, 'TOYOTA AVALON 2022': 18, 'TOYOTA ALPHARD 2020': 2, 'LEXUS RC 2020': 6, 'TOYOTA PRIUS v 2017': 1, 'LEXUS NX HYBRID 2020': 1}

With pandaStates errors on canState0/2:
Missing ECU routes: 40, dongles: 19

With out pandaStates errors:
Missing ECU routes: 2, dongles: 2
All missing ECU platform (routes): {'TOYOTA CAMRY 2018': 13, 'TOYOTA HIGHLANDER 2020': 18, 'TOYOTA RAV4 2022': 1, 'TOYOTA CAMRY 2021': 1, 'TOYOTA COROLLA TSS2 2019': 2, 'TOYOTA RAV4 2019': 1, 'TOYOTA COROLLA 2017': 1, 'TOYOTA HIGHLANDER 2017': 2, 'TOYOTA RAV4 HYBRID 2019': 1, 'TOYOTA CAMRY HYBRID 2018': 1, 'TOYOTA HIGHLANDER HYBRID 2018': 1}

@sshane
Copy link
Contributor Author

sshane commented Sep 29, 2023

Last 10 FW version PRs are below. This PR would have matched 3/10 cases. 4/10 failed due to a counterpart hybrid platform that is too similar to match. And the final 3/10 failures were for legitimate reasons—2 unseen model years and 1 API difference.

Using the hybrid ECU to detect if it's a hybrid, it eliminates all 4 of those failures, bringing the matches up to 7/10.

Failure/Success Reason Pull Request
Failure New model year Lexus IS 2022 - #30032
Failure In exclude list for hybrid similarity Lexus NX 2020 - #30031
Success Camry Hybrid 2023 - #29508
Failure Hybrid similarity C-HR Hybrid 2020 - #29223
Failure Hybrid similarity Lexus RX Hybrid 2022 - #29060
Failure Japanese EPS version that supports LKA RAV4 Hybrid 2023 - #28891
Failure New model year UX Hybrid 2023 - #28766
Success Recall Camry 2019 - #28679
Failure Hybrid similarity Lexus NX 2021 - #28678
Success Highlander TSS2 - #28096

The Camry 2019 in there is also a real case of the user getting a FW update for TSB/recall that we now would have caught. See the FW in that PR, but here is the engine platform code change, it's a minor version just as I hypothesized is common from the TSB docs I found online: {b'89663-33-Q6': {b'200', b'500'}}

@adeebshihadeh
Copy link
Contributor

adeebshihadeh commented Sep 29, 2023

3/10 is a start, but we definitely have to do better. What's this hybrid similarity? Can we fix it? As for new model years, it's just a convenient proxy for API, so we can eventually get rid of that one when we can more exactly define and fingerprint the API.

@sshane
Copy link
Contributor Author

sshane commented Sep 29, 2023

That's the ECUs that are shared that I talked about that will be fixed by using the hybrid ECU.

@sshane
Copy link
Contributor Author

sshane commented Oct 5, 2023

There are still a few minor API differences with hybrid/ICE. For example, only hybrid variant of RAV4 and Lexus ES are in NO_STOP_TIMER_CAR. Plus, the DSU messages dict has hybrid differences, specifically Highlander.

I believe that these differences likely aren't important and can still be merged, but I do not want to do too many things + verification of each at once, so I'll remove the gas pedal logging and only merge platforms that I can from the fuzzy exclude list (which should be a lot, but not all) to start.

@adeebshihadeh
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to look into that first before merging any of the hybrids. Otherwise, these differences will be difficult to find on new ports.

@sshane
Copy link
Contributor Author

sshane commented Oct 6, 2023

The differences are only TSS-P as far as I can tell, so there shouldn't be any confusion with new TSS2 models:

So rule of thumb going forward for new TSS-P car ports: if it can do stop and go and the default doesn't match, make a new platform for ICE/hybrid. If the DSU messages don't fully match or don't work, make a new platform.

@sshane
Copy link
Contributor Author

sshane commented Oct 7, 2023

Re-ran the notebook and still no false positives with excluded self FW, and no mismatches with online or stock fuzzy fingerprinting function. Should be GTG.

@sshane sshane changed the title Toyota: reliable fuzzy fingerprinting Toyota: parse FW versions for more reliable fuzzy fingerprinting Oct 8, 2023
@sshane sshane merged commit c14b765 into master Oct 8, 2023
22 of 23 checks passed
@sshane sshane deleted the toyota-fuzzy-v2 branch October 8, 2023 01:09
@sshane sshane mentioned this pull request Jan 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants