Add obvious-ci docker source

[jakirkham]

@pelson, as discussed after the general meeting on the 2016-04-29, I am adding this PR to add the obvious-ci docker image here. This is being removed it from the Obvious-CI repo in this PR ( pelson/Obvious-CI#65 ). Also, will setup a Docker Hub autobuild in a moment. Already tried building this locally from this repo here and it works fine.

[jakirkham]

Weird. I can't create an autobuild as Docker Hub doesn't list the conda-forge organization.

[jakirkham]

@ocefpaf, would you mind configuring this for autobuilding on DockerHub. I seem to lack sufficient privileges to do this. Once it is setup, I should be able to change the settings though.

[ocefpaf]

Not sure what I have to do here. Does your new powers allow you to complete this task? If not I can take a second look at this.

[jakirkham]

I'm looking into it. Maybe.

[jakirkham]

I don't think so. We need to enable the Docker Hub Registry for the org. Here is some info about how to do that.

[ocefpaf]

I will take a look at that soon. Thanks for the info!

[ocefpaf]

I cannot see that Applications section. Not sure how to proceed. I try Other things too but I must confess I either don't have the proper credentials or I have no idea what I should do (probably both 😉)

[jakirkham]

They call it "OAuth applications" now.

[ocefpaf]

I figure that out, but I should see the DockerHub request there, right? I see nothing.

[jakirkham]

So, maybe start with this?

[ocefpaf]

Humn... I thought you've done that and I should just "approve." Let me finish some things here and I will do back to it.

[jakirkham]

It's been awhile since I have done this for an org, but I believe they send you over to GitHub, which asks you which orgs you want to setup at that point.

[jakirkham]

Humn... I thought you've done that and I should just "approve." Let me finish some things here and I will do back to it.

Good point. I have done this now.

[jakirkham]

It says "Access request pending" by the conda-forge org.

[jakirkham]

Ha, I think we got it.

[ocefpaf]

Good point. I have done this now.

You did not had to do it right now 😉

It says "Access request pending" by the conda-forge org.

Done!

Ha, I think we got it.

Wow you are way too fast!!!

[jakirkham]

More like my notifications are too fast. 😆

[jakirkham]

So, I created an autobuild on Docker Hub for obvious-ci and triggered it to run. Let's see what happens.

[jakirkham]

Works great. Pulled down and tested.

It can be found here. The image is called condaforge/obvious-ci. I just put the build under the default tag latest. Though we may change that later. We should probably role this out across staged-recipes and add a PR to conda-smithy to change the image location to this one.

[jakirkham]

This PR ( conda-forge/staged-recipes#514 ) switches the image used by staged-recipes to the one generated here.

This PR ( conda-forge/conda-smithy#151 ) switches the image used in conda-smithy to the one generated here.

[pelson]

Sorry, I guess I should have been more clear - I don't think we want the words "obvious-ci" anywhere in conda-forge in the long term. We should come up with an appropriate name which reflects its function.

I'm surprised you don't have exactly the same access as @ocefpaf, @jakirkham - you are both admin on the conda-forge org...

[jakirkham]

Sorry, I guess I should have been more clear - I don't think we want the words "obvious-ci" anywhere in conda-forge in the long term. We should come up with an appropriate name which reflects its function.

Yeah, I think I missed that. I generally understood the obvious-ci code base was going away in the long term, but was missing this needed to be renamed. Opened an issue ( #8 ).

I'm surprised you don't have exactly the same access as @ocefpaf, @jakirkham - you are both admin on the conda-forge org...

Really? Yeah, weirdly, I don't. Not sure why then. Is there something I needed to do?