Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use symlinks while copying from file sources to improve perf. #1867

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2017

Conversation

stuertz
Copy link
Contributor

@stuertz stuertz commented Mar 23, 2017

I wondered why using file sources, no symlinks were used. Seems to be forgotten.

I tried running the very long running mentioned tests, but they fail before and after my change :-(

Running my local build worked fine for me with this change.

@msarahan
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, master is in heavy construction. Should be more stable soon. Do you mind rebasing your work on the 2.1.x branch for now? I will get it in more quickly that way, and the tests there should all be passing.

@stuertz stuertz changed the base branch from master to 2.1.x March 24, 2017 10:47
@msarahan
Copy link
Contributor

I don't know what's up with the CI's. I'm just going to merge this and see how it does. Thanks @stuertz

@msarahan msarahan merged commit 9d6fb2a into conda:2.1.x Mar 24, 2017
@stuertz stuertz deleted the filesource_as_symlink branch March 25, 2017 08:49
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 4, 2022

Hi there, thank you for your contribution!

This pull request has been automatically locked because it has not had recent activity after being closed.

Please open a new issue or pull request if needed.

Thanks!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked [bot] locked due to inactivity label May 4, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
locked [bot] locked due to inactivity
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants