Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Broken link in /docs/source/admin.rst #84

Closed
Maggie-M opened this issue May 27, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Broken link in /docs/source/admin.rst #84

Maggie-M opened this issue May 27, 2015 · 5 comments
Labels
locked [bot] locked due to inactivity

Comments

@Maggie-M
Copy link
Contributor

Below the fifth paragraph on this page, there is a broken link in the text:

"See also: Conda configuration file."

@asmeurer
Copy link
Contributor

@electronwill @kerrywatson1

Not only is the link broken, but we should never use a full url for an internal reference. It should always be a cross-reference so that it generates the link automatically.

@electronwill
Copy link
Contributor

Am fixing this now.

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Aaron Meurer notifications@github.com
wrote:

@electronwill https://github.com/electronwill @kerrywatson1
https://github.com/kerrywatson1

Not only is the link broken, but we should never use a full url for an
internal reference. It should always be a cross-reference so that it
generates the link automatically.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#84 (comment).

@electronwill
Copy link
Contributor

OK, pull request #86 should fix this.

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Will Warner electronwill@gmail.com wrote:

Am fixing this now.

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Aaron Meurer notifications@github.com
wrote:

@electronwill https://github.com/electronwill @kerrywatson1
https://github.com/kerrywatson1

Not only is the link broken, but we should never use a full url for an
internal reference. It should always be a cross-reference so that it
generates the link automatically.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#84 (comment).

@electronwill
Copy link
Contributor

@Maggie-M @asmeurer Oops, we never closed this issue-- it's fixed and can be closed now, though.

@asmeurer asmeurer closed this as completed Aug 4, 2015
@github-actions
Copy link

Hi there, thank you for your contribution!

This issue has been automatically locked because it has not had recent activity after being closed.

Please open a new issue if needed.

Thanks!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked [bot] locked due to inactivity label Mar 25, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 25, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
locked [bot] locked due to inactivity
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants