Skip to content

"sequenced after" undefined #61

@sdutoit

Description

@sdutoit

From an email to cxxeditor@:

I found "sequenced after" used in 5.17[expr.ass] but I could not find where it was defined. (I searched N3485. This is the only appearance. )

Would it better to use "sequenced before" to instead, or introduce the term "sequenced after" in 1.9[intro.execution] just like italicized "sequence before"?

PS. I found both "sequenced before" and "sequenced after" in WG14/N1570 5.1.2.3/2 defined as normative terms.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions