-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 785
Closed
Description
From an email to cxxeditor@:
I found "sequenced after" used in 5.17[expr.ass] but I could not find where it was defined. (I searched N3485. This is the only appearance. )
Would it better to use "sequenced before" to instead, or introduce the term "sequenced after" in 1.9[intro.execution] just like italicized "sequence before"?
PS. I found both "sequenced before" and "sequenced after" in WG14/N1570 5.1.2.3/2 defined as normative terms.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels