Skip to content

P2520R0 move_iterator<T*> should be a random access iterator #5691

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 18, 2022
Merged

P2520R0 move_iterator<T*> should be a random access iterator #5691

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 18, 2022

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the post-2022-07 milestone Jul 29, 2022
@jensmaurer jensmaurer force-pushed the motions-2022-07-lwg-35 branch 2 times, most recently from 7018bd8 to 899826e Compare July 29, 2022 20:54
@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2022-07-lwg-35 branch 2 times, most recently from 16a7ce2 to 19813cb Compare August 17, 2022 23:46
@jensmaurer @tkoeppe
P2520R0 move_iterator<T*> should be a random access iterator
1f909a6 
Editorial changes: A misspelling of the header name in the feature
test macro entry has been fixed.
@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2022-07-lwg-35 branch from 19813cb to 1f909a6 Compare August 17, 2022 23:50
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 3439a34 into main Aug 18, 2022
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the motions-2022-07-lwg-35 branch November 18, 2022 21:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jwakely jwakely jwakely approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
post-2022-07
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[2022-07 LWG Motion 35] P2520R0 move_iterator<T*> should be a random access iterator P2520 move_iterator should be a random access iterator
3 participants
@jensmaurer @jwakely @tkoeppe