[fs.op.copy] Replace non-codeblocks with outputblocks
#7146
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tkoeppe
added
the
needs rebase
frederick-vs-ja
force-pushed
the
eelis/outputblocks
branch
from
8b54584 to
8603eea
Compare
These blocks are used for showing of directory hierarchy but not code, so we should use `outputblock`. Co-authored-by: Eelis van der Weegen <eelis@eelis.net>
frederick-vs-ja
force-pushed
the
eelis/outputblocks
branch
from
8603eea to
763d361
Compare
frederick-vs-ja
changed the title
codeblocks with outputblockscodeblocks with outputblocks
|
@tkoeppe I've rebased and reworded the commit/PR messages. |
jensmaurer
removed
the
needs rebase
jensmaurer
approved these changes
Mar 29, 2025
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These blocks are used for showing of directory hierarchy but not code, so we should use
outputblock.