Suspicious "cv-qualified void"

[cpplearner]

N4480 8.2.1.2[memory.smartptr.shared.obs]p6 reads

Remarks: When T is an array type or cv-qualified void, it is unspecified whether this member function is declared. If it is declared, it is unspecified what its return type is, except that the declaration (although not necessarily the definition) of the function shall be well formed.

The phrase "cv-qualified void" seems to imply that if T is cv-unqualified (plain) void, then this remark doesn't apply. I wonder whether this is the intent.

[jwakely]

We should check the LWG minutes (from Issaquah, I think) to see if we discussed it. I think the intent is "(possible cv-qualified) void"

[jyasskin]

I don't see it mentioned in http://wiki.edg.com/twiki/bin/view/Wg21issaquah/LibraryWorkingGroup. I'll file a library issue.

[jyasskin]

Filed http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2500. Thanks for the report.