We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Class types with a non-static data member of array type do not have strong structural equality.
Proposed change: Require only that the (ultimate) element type of such an array type have strong structural equality.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
EWG Monday: http://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/US092
Does EWG want to consider US092 for C++20
Consensus to discuss. Jeff Snyder to come back with proposed wording.
Sorry, something went wrong.
EWG voted to accept US092 with modifications by allowing arrays as members of class type NTTPs.
CWG in Belfast: Accepted with modification. See paper P1907R1.
jensmaurer
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Class types with a non-static data member of array type do not have strong structural equality.
Proposed change:
Require only that the (ultimate) element type of such an array type have strong structural equality.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: