Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

US092 11.10.01 [class.compare.default] p04.2.1 Array members should have strong structural equality #91

Closed
wg21bot opened this issue Oct 23, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by cplusplus/draft#3441
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator

wg21bot commented Oct 23, 2019

Class types with a non-static data member of array type do not have strong structural equality.

Proposed change:
Require only that the (ultimate) element type of such an array type have strong structural equality.

@wg21bot wg21bot added the EWG Evolution label Oct 23, 2019
@jfbastien jfbastien added the NTTP label Nov 4, 2019
@jfbastien
Copy link
Collaborator

jfbastien commented Nov 4, 2019

EWG Monday: http://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/US092

Does EWG want to consider US092 for C++20

F A
21 2

Consensus to discuss. Jeff Snyder to come back with proposed wording.

@davidstone
Copy link
Collaborator

EWG voted to accept US092 with modifications by allowing arrays as members of class type NTTPs.

@davidstone davidstone added CWG Core and removed EWG Evolution labels Nov 8, 2019
@davidstone davidstone assigned davidstone and unassigned davidstone Nov 8, 2019
@jensmaurer jensmaurer self-assigned this Nov 8, 2019
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

CWG in Belfast: Accepted with modification. See paper P1907R1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants