P2355 R2 Postfix fold expressions

[wg21bot]

P2355R0 Postfix fold expressions (S. Davis Herring)

[erichkeane]

This paper was seen on the 2021-08-12 EWG telecon.

Polls:

We would like to forward P2355R0 as written to electronic polling for forwarding to CWG.

SF	F	N	A	SA
0	3	2	5	0

Result: NOT Consensus

EWG would like to see further work in the direction of P2355 to extend fold expressions.

SF	F	N	A	SA
3	6	0	0	0

Result: Consensus

We wish to see P2355 again in EWG, with further exploration of the extended proposal as presented.

SF	F	N	A	SA
5	5	0	0	0

Result: Consensus

We believe that P2355 should remove the '()' syntax.

SF	F	N	A	SA
0	0	2	1	6

Result: NOT Consensus

[JohelEGP]

The last result doesn't agree with the votes. Perhaps the question is presented wrongly.

[erichkeane]

The last result doesn't agree with the votes. Perhaps the question is presented wrongly.

Thanks, fixed.

[wg21bot]

P2355R1 Postfix fold expressions (S. Davis Herring)

[erichkeane]

EWG discussed this paper on Tuesday afternoon in Tokyo. The following poll was taken:

D2355R2 Postfix fold expressions: we encourage more work on extending fold expressions, knowing that our time is limited.

SF	F	N	A	SA
1	7	7	4	2

Result: Not Consensus

[wg21bot]

P2355R2 Postfix fold expressions (S. Davis Herring)