P2355 Postfix fold expressions #1031

wg21bot · 2021-04-25T07:52:25Z

P2355R0 Postfix fold expressions (S. Davis Herring)

erichkeane · 2021-08-12T18:29:38Z

This paper was seen on the 2021-08-12 EWG telecon.

Polls:

We would like to forward P2355R0 as written to electronic polling for forwarding to CWG.

SF	F	N	A	SA
0	3	2	5	0

Result: NOT Consensus

EWG would like to see further work in the direction of P2355 to extend fold expressions.

SF	F	N	A	SA
3	6	0	0	0

Result: Consensus

We wish to see P2355 again in EWG, with further exploration of the extended proposal as presented.

SF	F	N	A	SA
5	5	0	0	0

Result: Consensus

We believe that P2355 should remove the '()' syntax.

SF	F	N	A	SA
0	0	2	1	6

Result: NOT Consensus

wg21bot · 2023-02-20T21:51:43Z

P2355R1 Postfix fold expressions (S. Davis Herring)

wg21bot added the EWG Evolution label Apr 25, 2021

wg21bot added this to the 2021-telecon milestone Apr 25, 2021

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

jfbastien added the needs-revision Paper needs changes before it can proceed label Sep 7, 2021

jensmaurer removed this from the 2021-telecon milestone Nov 12, 2021

wg21bot removed the needs-revision Paper needs changes before it can proceed label Feb 20, 2023

wg21bot added this to the 2023-telecon milestone Feb 20, 2023

Comments