Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

P2355 R2 Postfix fold expressions #1031

Closed
wg21bot opened this issue Apr 25, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

P2355 R2 Postfix fold expressions #1031

wg21bot opened this issue Apr 25, 2021 · 6 comments
Labels
EWG Evolution
Milestone

Comments

@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator

wg21bot commented Apr 25, 2021

P2355R0 Postfix fold expressions (S. Davis Herring)

@wg21bot wg21bot added the EWG Evolution label Apr 25, 2021
@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2021-telecon milestone Apr 25, 2021
@erichkeane
Copy link
Collaborator

erichkeane commented Aug 12, 2021

This paper was seen on the 2021-08-12 EWG telecon.

Polls:

We would like to forward P2355R0 as written to electronic polling for forwarding to CWG.

SF F N A SA
0 3 2 5 0

Result: NOT Consensus

EWG would like to see further work in the direction of P2355 to extend fold expressions.

SF F N A SA
3 6 0 0 0

Result: Consensus

We wish to see P2355 again in EWG, with further exploration of the extended proposal as presented.

SF F N A SA
5 5 0 0 0

Result: Consensus

We believe that P2355 should remove the '()' syntax.

SF F N A SA
0 0 2 1 6

Result: NOT Consensus

@JohelEGP

This comment has been minimized.

@erichkeane

This comment has been minimized.

@jfbastien jfbastien added the needs-revision Paper needs changes before it can proceed label Sep 7, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed this from the 2021-telecon milestone Nov 12, 2021
@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wg21bot commented Feb 20, 2023

P2355R1 Postfix fold expressions (S. Davis Herring)

@wg21bot wg21bot removed the needs-revision Paper needs changes before it can proceed label Feb 20, 2023
@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2023-telecon milestone Feb 20, 2023
@erichkeane
Copy link
Collaborator

EWG discussed this paper on Tuesday afternoon in Tokyo. The following poll was taken:

D2355R2 Postfix fold expressions: we encourage more work on extending fold expressions, knowing that our time is limited.

SF F N A SA
1 7 7 4 2

Result: Not Consensus

@erichkeane erichkeane added the needs-revision Paper needs changes before it can proceed label Mar 19, 2024
@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed this from the 2023-telecon milestone Mar 19, 2024
@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wg21bot commented Apr 17, 2024

P2355R2 Postfix fold expressions (S. Davis Herring)

@wg21bot wg21bot removed the needs-revision Paper needs changes before it can proceed label Apr 17, 2024
@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2024-telecon milestone Apr 17, 2024
@wg21bot wg21bot changed the title P2355 Postfix fold expressions P2355 R2 Postfix fold expressions Apr 17, 2024
@wg21bot wg21bot reopened this Apr 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
EWG Evolution
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants