Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

P2355 Postfix fold expressions #1031

Open
wg21bot opened this issue Apr 25, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

P2355 Postfix fold expressions #1031

wg21bot opened this issue Apr 25, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
EWG needs-revision

Comments

@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@wg21bot wg21bot commented Apr 25, 2021

P2355R0 Postfix fold expressions (S. Davis Herring)

@wg21bot wg21bot added the EWG label Apr 25, 2021
@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2021-telecon milestone Apr 25, 2021
@erichkeane
Copy link
Collaborator

@erichkeane erichkeane commented Aug 12, 2021

This paper was seen on the 2021-08-12 EWG telecon.

Polls:

We would like to forward P2355R0 as written to electronic polling for forwarding to CWG.

SF F N A SA
0 3 2 5 0

Result: NOT Consensus

EWG would like to see further work in the direction of P2355 to extend fold expressions.

SF F N A SA
3 6 0 0 0

Result: Consensus

We wish to see P2355 again in EWG, with further exploration of the extended proposal as presented.

SF F N A SA
5 5 0 0 0

Result: Consensus

We believe that P2355 should remove the '()' syntax.

SF F N A SA
0 0 2 1 6

Result: NOT Consensus

@JohelEGP

This comment has been minimized.

@erichkeane

This comment has been minimized.

@jfbastien jfbastien added the needs-revision label Sep 7, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed this from the 2021-telecon milestone Nov 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
EWG needs-revision
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants