P2814 R1 Trivial Relocatability --- Comparing P1144 with P2786

[wg21bot]

P2814R0 Trivial Relocatability --- Comparing P1144 with P2786 (Mungo Gill, Alisdair Meredith, Arthur O'Dwyer)

[brycelelbach]

Evolution, send this to us if we need to see it.

[jfbastien]

P1144 std::is_trivially_relocatable
P2786 Trivial relocatability options

Knowing that our time is limited, EWG is interested in a merged paper addressing trivial relocatability.

SF	F	N	A	SA
13	4	5	0	1

Result: Consensus
SA: want whole story on relocatability before addressing trivial relocatability.

EWG wants to wait for non-trivial relocation papers before proceeding with trivial relocation.

SF	F	N	A	SA
2	5	8	7	2

Result: Not consensus
SA: proposals for handling relocation has complexity compared to what we see here. Don’t want to wait years.

EWG wants P2786 to have library extensions (similar to P1144) before it can proceed.

SF	F	N	A	SA
3	3	9	2	3

Result: Not consensus
SF: EWG is failing in its responsibility because LEWG isn’t divorced from the language.
A: design of P2786 is a core language facility, open to users on the STL and non-STL.
SA: don’t want to wait, you can build on top of it and assume someone will.

[wg21bot]

P2814R1 Trivial Relocatability --- Comparing P1144 with P2786 (Mungo Gill, Alisdair Meredith, Arthur O'Dwyer)