Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

P1383 More constexpr for <cmath> and <complex> #168

Open
jensmaurer opened this issue Jan 26, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Collaborator

commented Jan 26, 2019

P1383R0 More constexpr for <cmath> and <complex> (Edward J. Rosten, Oliver J. Rosten)

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the 2019-02 milestone Jan 26, 2019

@jensmaurer jensmaurer changed the title P1383 More constexpr for &lt;cmath&gt; and &lt;complex&gt; P1383 More constexpr for <cmath> and <complex> Jan 27, 2019

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added LEWGI and removed LEWG LWG labels Jan 31, 2019

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to Thursday in LEWG-I in Kona 2019 Feb 13, 2019

@Lawrence-Crowl

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Feb 20, 2019

SG6 sees no technical barrier to this proposal.
SF 3 F 3 N 1 A 0 SA 0
PASS

SG6 cautions subsequent committees on the difficulty of implementing
these functions correctly.
SF 0 F 1 N 3 A 1 SA 2
FAIL

@Lawrence-Crowl Lawrence-Crowl removed the SG6 label Feb 22, 2019

@jensmaurer

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

commented Feb 24, 2019

Discussed in LEWG-I in Kona.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed this from the 2019-02 milestone Mar 22, 2019

@brycelelbach

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Jul 12, 2019

Kona 2019-02 LEWGI Minutes

P1383R0 More constexpr for <cmath> and <complex>

Champion: Louis Dionne

Minute Taker: Mark Hoemenn

Start Overview: 4:13

Start Discussion: 4:38

Start Polling: 4:39

POLL: We like P1383R0 more constexpr and for C++23.

Strongly For Weakly For Neutral Weakly Against Strongly Against
1 5 2 4 0

Attendance: 15

That does not have consensus.

POLL: We like P1383R0 more constexpr and for a constexpr math TS.

Strongly For Weakly For Neutral Weakly Against Strongly Against
5 7 1 0 0

Attendance: 15

That has consensus.

End: 16:43

CONSENSUS: Bring a revision of P1383R0 retargeted for a TS to LEWG(I) for further design review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.