-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
P3547 R1 Modeling Access Control With Reflection #2196
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
SG7 discussed P3547R0 andP3587 on telecon and took following polls: P3547R0: SG7 wants reflection methods (
Result: consensus P3547R0: SG7 wants reflection to provide user-accessible
Result: not consensus |
Both papers will be seen in EWG in Hagenberg. |
P3547R1 Modeling Access Control With Reflection (Dan Katz, Ville Voutilainen) |
Discussed in EWG in Hagenberg: POLLS: P3547R0: EWG wants reflection methods (
Consensus in favor. P3547R0: EWG does not want reflection to provide user-accessible
Consensus against. Next stop: LEWG |
2025-02-12 Library Evolution Hagenberg MeetingP3547R1: Modeling Access Control With Reflection 2025-02-12 Library Evolution Hagenberg Minutes Champion: Dan Katz SummaryPOLL: Forward P3547R1 to LWG for C++26
Attendance: 27 (IP) + 5 (R) Next StepsForward P3547R1 to LWG for C++26. |
Folded into D2996R10; leaving open for LWG review convenience. |
P3547R0 Modeling Access Control With Reflection (Dan Katz, Ville Voutilainen)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: