P1029R2 Move Relocation: Design Feedback
Champion: Niall Douglas
Minute Taker: Ruslan Arutyunyan
Start Overview: 07-17 15:19
Start Polling: 15:26
POLL: We understand and accept that
Given WG21's limited time constraints, should we encourage the author to continue work in this direction?
Do we want an opt-in mechanism for propagation from bases/members (not necessarily in this paper)?
Should =relocates work with types that have virtual destructors?
Do we approve of the direction for permitting passing =relocates types into C functions?
Given the current state of the paper + our current feedback, do we believe this paper is ready for EWG?
We believe that P1029 and P1144 are
We concluded that P1029 needs a revision and another visit to EWGI, however it should not have its progress through the committee linked to P1144.
Through a mailing list discussion, the author has let me know that they do not intend to move this paper forward. I'm therefore closing this issue, with the expectation that we can re-open it if another person wants to champion it.
Part of the discussion revolved around