P2013 Freestanding Language: Optional ::operator new #749
Comments
Given the time constraints of the committee, should we spend additional committee effort on P2013?
Is a Feature test macro a valuable addition to this paper?
Do we believe that P2013 is sufficently developed to be seen by EWG?
|
EWG Prague Friday afternoon: We’re interested in freestanding having an optional operator new, please come back with wording.
|
P2013R1 Freestanding Language: Optional ::operator new (Ben Craig) |
This was discussed in an EWG telecon today. POLL: After updating wording for "either/or", mandates, and talking to SG10 about the feature test macro, P2013 is tentatively ready to be forwarded to CWG.
|
P2013R2 Freestanding Language: Optional ::operator new (Ben Craig) |
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
P2013R3 Freestanding Language: Optional ::operator new (Ben Craig) |
Adding to the SG22 plate for WG14 awareness and feedback on WG21 efforts to allow allocations in freestanding environments. |
P2013R0 Freestanding Language: Optional ::operator new (Ben Craig)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: